Archive for splice

Cinema Knife Fight Presents: THE BEST OF 2010

Posted in 2011, Best Of Lists, Cinema Knife Fights with tags , , , , , on January 5, 2011 by knifefighter

CINEMA KNIFE FIGHT: THE BEST MOVIES OF 2010
by Michael Arruda and L.L. Soares

(The Scene: An old-style art deco movie palace. MICHAEL ARRUDA & LL SOARES are dressed in tuxedos. They are sipping champagne, with LL’s being a darker shade of red than Michael’s.)

MA: Happy New Year, everyone!

LS: Yes, Happy New Year!

MA: We’re ringing in the New Year with our picks for the Top 5 Best Movies of 2010, based on films we saw and reviewed for this site. I’m also sticking to horror/science fiction movies, while LL has decided to include non-genre films as well.

LS: Bully for you! I bet you think you’re special or something!

MA: Ahem. I’ll start.

My pick for my Number 5 movie of 2010 is SPLICE, the science fiction thriller starring Adrien Brody. This slick science fiction flick was surprisingly adult and featured a well written screenplay by director Vincenzo Natali and Antoinette Terry Bryant, as well as fine performances by Adrien Brody and Sarah Polley as the two scientists who create a new life form in their laboratory.

I wasn’t expecting much from this one and ended up liking it a lot. I enjoyed its story, and I also liked that it didn’t deteriorate into a melodramatic horror tale, but pretty much remained a solid science fiction movie throughout.

Well-made, well-written, and well-acted, SPLICE is well worth your time.

LS: I liked SPLICE a lot, too. I thought it was a really entertaining story, and well-acted. It even went a few places I didn’t think it would have the guts to, so that was a nice surprise. Adrien Brody actually turned a few solid performances in 2010, and is starting to become a real genre mainstay. I wonder if his career will continue to go in that direction, instead of the more arty films he made his reputation on, such as his Oscar-winning performance in Roman Polanski’s THE PIANIST (2002). And, aside from Brody and Polley, I also want to point out the terrific performance by Delphine Chaneac as Dren, the life form they create.

MA: I actually didn’t enjoy Dren as much as you did.

LS: For my Number 5 choice, it’s a tie, between my two favorite remakes of 2010. The first is THE WOLFMAN, starring Benicio Del Toro as the doomed and tragic Lawrence Talbot. This was the role made famous by Lon Chaney, Jr. in the 1940s, and there was a lot of apprehension going into this one. Chaney is one of the most underrated actors from the days of the original Universal monster films, but I always thought his performances as Talbot were among his best, and it was his signature role. Not only did the remake of THE WOLFMAN treat the original with the proper respect, it even strived to recapture the atmosphere and feel of the early Universal films, as well as the Hammer films of the 1950s. This movie wasn’t perfect – a subplot involving Talbot’s father, played by Anthony Hopkins, seemed a bit misguided – but overall this was really enjoyable film.

The other great remake of 2010 was THE CRAZIES. I was never a huge fan of George Romero’s original film from 1973 – I always thought it was a weaker variation on his zombie films – and I think director Breck Eisner actually improved on the original. The cast helped a lot, too, especially Timothy Olyphant as Sheriff Dave Dutten and Radha Mitchell as his wife Judy. This one had a lot of atmosphere and tension, and I liked it a lot.

MA: I liked both these movies, and they both made my Top 5, so I’ll have more to say on these in a bit. Your turn.

LS: What, me again?

MA: Would you like someone else to take your place?

LS: A wiseguy, eh?

Okay. My Number 4 pick for the best films of 2010 is KICK-ASS. This is a surprise since you and I didn’t review this one. John Harvey did!

From the trailer, I expected this to be a lame parody of superhero films, but the movie itself was much different. Basically the story of people without superpowers who decide to become heroes, it’s an interesting idea. Aaron Johnson is okay in the lead, but the real reason to see this movie is for the one-two punch of Nicolas Cage, doing his best Adam West impersonation as Big Daddy, and the amazing Chloe Moretz as his daughter, Hit-Girl. I thought their storyline was way more interesting than Kick-Ass’s. Hit-Girl is easily one of my favorite characters of the year. With her foul mouth and astounding martial arts skills, she easily dominates every single scene she is in. My only complaint about the movie is Christopher Mintz-Plasse as “Red Mist.” I loved the guy as McLovin’ in SUPERBAD (2007), but he seemed too jokey and out of place here, and it would have been a lot more interesting if his character had been played in a much darker way.

MA: I loved this movie too, and I didn’t include it on my list because I was focusing on horror movies. I thought Chloe Moretz as Hit-Girl was by far the best part of this movie, and while I enjoyed Cage’s Adam West bit, I didn’t really enjoy his performance as much as Moretz’s.

Now it’s time for my Number 4 pick.

At Number 4, I’m going with THE WOLFMAN.

This is a strange pick for me, because there were a lot of parts to THE WOLFMAN that I didn’t like, but the parts I did like, I liked a lot, and these mostly have to do with the look of the Wolfman himself.

By far, the best part of THE WOLFMAN is its werewolf scenes, and this is because the werewolf looks really good. It’s an effective mix of CGI effects and wonderful make-up by make-up master Rick Baker. Not only does the werewolf look frightening, but it also captures the look of the original. There’s a lot of Lon Chaney Jr. in the face of Benicio Del Toro’s werewolf.

Not so good is the story. Screenwriters Andrew Kevin Walker (who wrote SLEEPY HOLLOW [1999]) and David Self (who wrote THIRTEEN DAYS [1999]) wrote an average story that did very little to wow me. I didn’t like the new characterization of Larry Talbot, of his father, Sir John Talbot, nor did I enjoy the new character, Inspector Abberline.

Benicio Del Toro is fine as Lawrence Talbot, but what’s missing from his performance is what made Chaney stand out as Larry Talbot in the original, and that is, his tragic angst at being a werewolf. In this movie, Talbot’s life’s a mess even before he becomes a werewolf. So, it’s almost as if this latest tragedy is no big deal for him.

Director Joe Johnston does do good job at the helm. The movie looks almost beautiful. There are times the scenes in this film look like paintings. And the action/scare scenes work very, very well.

So, the story’s not so hot, but the technical aspects of the film and the look of the actual Wolf Man more than make up for it. On the strength of its visuals alone, THE WOLFMAN is my pick for the 4th best horror film of the year.

LS: Well, it was Number 5 for me, so I totally agree that it’s a good one.

MA: My Number 3 pick is a movie I didn’t review but saw anyway, and that would be THE LAST EXORCISM. This was a complete surprise for me, because I wasn’t expecting anything from it. It had a compelling story, smart direction by Daniel Stamm, it was scary, and it included a knockout performance by Patrick Fabian as Rev. Cotton Marcus.

I was on the edge of my seat a couple of times during this movie, and as far as exorcism movies go, other than the original THE EXORCIST (1973), there haven’t been many better than this one. It was far superior to the recent EXORCIST sequel and to THE EXORCISM OF EMILY ROSE (2005)

LS: I actually liked THE LAST EXORCISM a lot, too. It made my Top 10 list, but was Number 7, so you liked it a little more than I did. But I thought it was a big surprise – I went into it not expecting much and I was really impressed. It used the whole “fake documentary” style perfectly, and Patrick Fabian was terrific as Reverend Marcus.

My Number 3 pick for the best films of 2010 was THE HUMAN CENTIPEDE.

This was easily the most buzzed-about horror film of the year, and I thought it delivered the goods. It doesn’t make a helluva lot of sense if you think about it – a mad scientist grafting together the digestive tracks of three people to form one large new life form – why would anyone want to do this? Well, because Dr. Heiter (played by Dieter Laser) is INSANE! I thought this was one weird, original little movie and I’m looking forward to the sequel.

MA: You’re right on the money with your comment that this one makes no sense, and that was my biggest problem with THE HUMAN CENTIPEDE. I also didn’t enjoy the character of Dr. Heiter either. He’s a walking mad scientist cliché. But you’re right about all the buzz surrounding this one. Go figure!

LS: My Number 2 pick for the best movie of 2010 was Darren Aronofky’s BLACK SWAN. A powerful psychological thriller about sexual repression and madness, it delivers an Oscar-worthy performance by Natalie Portman as Nina Sayers, a ballerina on the edge. Mila Kunis also turns in a great performance as Lilly, a girl who appears to represent Nina’s dark side. Aronofsky is one of the best directors making movies today and BLACK SWAN is just further proof of this.

MA: My Number 2 pick is PREDATORS. I loved PREDATORS.

This is another one that really surprised me, because again I had zero expectations for this movie. I really wasn’t into watching yet another PREDATOR movie. But this movie erased these doubts immediately, starting with the very first scene.

Writers Alex Litvak and Michael Finch wrote a story that hooked me from the get-go.

I think the main reason for its success was that PREDATORS tells a brand new story.

It’s not a remake or a “re-imagining” of the 1987 original movie PREDATOR, starring Arnold Schwarzenegger. It’s a brand new chapter in the franchise. It’s refreshingly entertaining throughout.

Another reason I was skeptical about PREDATORS was Adrien Brody. I didn’t really have much faith in him as the lead in an action-horror movie. He’s no Arnold Schwarzenegger, and I expected him to be sorely miscast. Boy, was I wrong. Not only does Brody actually carry this movie, he delivers one of the best performances in a genre film this year. He comes off as utterly convincing in the role of a tough, mercenary killer. Who woulda thought?

While the special effects were just OK, the action sequences are topnotch, thanks to director Nimrod Antal, who does a good job here. There are plenty of exciting action sequences and intense hunt scenes in this one, and it’s gory when it needs to be.

PREDATORS is easily one of the most entertaining horror movies of the year, and for me, it’s the runner up to the best horror film of the year.

LS: This was a great year for Adrien Brody. He breathed some new life into genre cinema, first with SPLICE and then PREDATORS, which is even better. I thought the Predators franchise was on its last legs, but this movie was smart, well-written, and well acted by all involved, but especially Brody. It was Number 9 on my Top 10 list, and I agree it was one of the best films of 2010.

MA: Now it’s time for our picks for the Number 1 movie of the year. The envelope, please. My pick for the Best Horror Movie of 2010 goes to: THE CRAZIES.

THE CRAZIES is a nonstop rollercoaster ride of a movie that kept me on the edge of my seat throughout. From the opening sequence at a baseball game, in a scene that is sweating with realism, the movie grabs you by the throat and doesn’t let go. For a movie like this, or any horror movie for that matter, the audience has to believe for it to work. From the get-go, THE CRAZIES will have you believing in every farfetched thing that happens, and it’ll do it with great acting, directing, and writing.

Director Breck Eisner crafts one compelling scene after another. The scene in the farmhouse where one of the townspeople, now a crazy, torments his family is wonderfully done and terribly frightening. The scene where Judy and Becca are strapped to tables, and they are menaced by the man with the pitchfork is incredibly suspenseful, and then there’s the even better scene in the car wash.

The screenplay was written by Scott Kosar, who also wrote the screenplay for THE AMITYVILLE HORROR (2005) and THE TEXAS CHAINSAW MASSACRE (2003), and Ray Wright. It’s filled with one memorable scene after another, along with realistic dialogue and fleshed out characters who you really care for.

LS: Pretty amazing that the guy who wrote that lame TEXAS CHAINSAW remake wrote a script as good as THE CRAZIES. I’m impressed.

MA: The acting is also excellent. Both Timothy Olyphant as Sheriff David Dutton and Radha Mitchell as Dr. Judy Dutton stand out as the leads in this movie, and Joe Anderson is even better in the supporting role as Deputy Russell Clark

THE CRAZIES is a relentless horror movie, one that goes for the throat early on and doesn’t let go.

Hands down, THE CRAZIES is the best horror movie of 2010.

LS: Well, since it made my Top 5, I totally agree that THE CRAZIES was an enjoyable flick.

Unlike you, I refuse to just stick to just horror movies – only because we reviewed a wide range of films in 2010. Sure, horror is still our main focus, but we also reviewed superhero films, westerns, and films a little harder to define. If we reviewed it here, then it’s fair game for our “Best Of” lists.

As for my Number 1 film of 2010, it was a movie I saw in the fall of 2010, but didn’t write a review for until this week. Gaspar Noe’s ENTER THE VOID. This is a movie about what happens after death, and it’s a trippy, surreal journey of the soul. It also defies categorization.

I thought it was visually astounding and emotionally powerful. And it’s like nothing else that came out in 2010. Since it was in very limited release, I doubt you had a chance to see this one, Michael. But then again, there’s a good chance it would not be your cup of tea, anyway.

MA: No, I didn’t get to see this one. But it sounds better than THE HUMAN CENTIPEDE!

Okay, that wraps things up from here. Happy New Year everybody!

(Confetti falls from the ceiling)

LS: And don’t forget to look for our WORST OF 2010 movies column, coming real soon!

—END—

© Copyright 2011 by Michael Arruda and L.L. Soares

SPLICE

Posted in 2010, Cinema Knife Fights, Science Fiction with tags , , , , on June 7, 2010 by knifefighter

CINEMA KNIFE FIGHT: SPLICE
by Michael Arruda and L.L. Soares

(THE SCENE: a busy laboratory. MICHAEL ARRUDA looks on as L.L. SOARES stirs together a bunch of chemicals)

LS: And add a bit of eye of newt and tongue of yak

MA: That doesn’t sound very scientific!

LS: What’s with the science? I’m making my lunch.

MA:  Well, in that case, could you add some tomato sauce. I like my yak tongue with sauce. Love those saucy tongues!

(LS flings a ladle of tomato sauce onto MA’s head.)

LS:  Saucy enough for you?

MA (wipes face with cloth and licks lips):  Actually, it could use some oregano, but that’s neither here nor there. We have a movie to review: the new cloning movie, SPLICE. Care to begin?

LS (puts down beakers):  Okay. This one starts off fast right away, with no slow explanations. Two scientists who are also lovers, Clive Nicoli (Adrien Brody) and Elsa Kast (Sarah Polley), are working on strange cloning experiments that involve splicing together DNA from various animals to form new species. When the movie opens, they have already created a brand new life form. The first of their kind—“Ginger” and “Fred”—are strange lumps of flesh that resemble nothing as much as giant crawling penises!

MA:  You said it, I didn’t. But you’re right. That’s what they look like.

LS:  I had a major flashback to Frank Hennenlotter’s BAD BIOLOGY, which I reviewed not too long ago (and which also had a crawling penis in it). It seems the main point of this research, though, isn’t to have fun with DNA, but to create new creatures which are teeming with proteins and chemicals that can cure diseases and get turned into pharmaceuticals. The major drug company the scientists work for, run by the ruthless Joan Charot (Simona Maicanescu), is only interested in making profits, otherwise they’ll pull the plug on the research, no matter how ground-breaking it is.

MA:  I thought this was a realistic plot point. The motives of Joan Charot and the drug company don’t come off as cliché.

LS:  When Clive and Elsa find out that they will not be funded to create more life forms, but are expected to extract goodies from the ones they’ve already created, they feel they’ve reached a scientific dead end. They had planned to create yet another new life form, this time including human DNA in the mix (because straight human cloning is illegal), but the company won’t fund it.

Instead of giving up, they simply continue their own experiments in secrecy, desperate to prove to themselves that they can do it (especially Elsa). After several failed attempts to mix animal and human chromosomes, they finally get it to work. The result is Dren (Delphine Chaneac), who first looks like an armless baby kangaroo but slowly gets more human as she grows at an accelerated rate (growing years in a matter of days).

MA:  I thought the baby Dren resembled a cross between an alien baby and a walking roast chicken. Something, like this! (Reaches into boiling pot with giant fork and lifts a strange looking roast, a chicken body with a CLOSE ENCOUNTERS alien head.)

LS:  Don’t touch that!  It’s not even close to being done yet!  (MA puts it back into the pot.)

Eventually, she’s a weird-looking, bald little girl who isn’t so easy to hide from the other scientists or the management, and eventually Clive and Elsa take Dren out to the country to stay in the barn of a farm that used to be Elsa’s childhood home.

At this point, Dren’s head is separated by a line that makes her look like an honest-to-God butthead!

(BEAVIS AND BUTTHEAD pop up and giggle)

BEAVIS: Heh, heh, he said Butthead.

BUTTHEAD: Haw haw. He said my name.

LS:  As Dren continues to grow, she also becomes more and more dangerous to those around her. And a few times when Dren escapes, everyone goes into panic mode.

That’s pretty much the story in a nutshell.

(Suddenly, from out of a large beaker, comes a little monster that looks like a live-action Porky Pig, but green. The creature runs around the room grunting and snorting)

LS: Hmmm, maybe I can have green eggs and ham for lunch.

MA: Hey, it’s your own personal Mini-Me!  (Green Pig lifts Alien Chicken from pot and starts dancing with it, knocking into test tubes and lab equipment.)  Hey!  Stop that!  He’s going to wreck the place.

(LS hits the creatures with a shovel)

GREEN PIG: Tha-tha-tha that’s all folks!

LS: Now where was I? For the most part, SPLICE was much better than I expected it to be. The trailers looked okay, but when I went into the theater, I wasn’t really expecting much. Good trailers have been attached to bad movies before, and I wasn’t going to get my hopes up.

Everyone involved here turns in good performances. The script is smart and seems aimed at adults rather than teenagers. And Dren is suitably creepy and sometimes even scary. Hell, there’s even some human-on-monster sex later on in the movie. So what’s not to like?

That said, there were moments when I found certain events hard to swallow, and the ending is predictable as hell. But for the most part, everything is good enough to make you happily suspend your disbelief.

The movie moves at a brisk pace, the research bits are never draggy, and Dren is actually a pretty cool creature.

I give it two and a half knives. I didn’t think it was a must-see movie, but if you do spend the money for a movie ticket, I don’t think you’ll feel ripped off. It was pretty decent.

What did you think, Michael?

MA:  I think I’m about to bore everybody, because I’m going to say the same things you just did. I wasn’t expecting much from this one either, and like you, I was pleasantly surprised. I think you hit the nail on the head when you said it was aimed at adults rather than teens. That was what stood out the most for me as I watched this picture, that the screenplay by Vincenzo Natali, who also directed, and Antoinette Terry Bryant, was refreshingly adult. And it was well-written.

I thought it started off slow, as most of the early scenes involved just our two lover scientists, Clive and Elsa, and at first they weren’t doing much for me. The beginning reminded me of David Cronenberg’s THE FLY (1986) as that film also featured two main characters almost exclusively throughout, Jeff Goldblum’s doomed scientist Seth Brundle and Geena Davis’s reporter. In that film Goldblum and Davis drew me in immediately, especially Goldblum who I think delivered the performance of his career in THE FLY.

Here, Adrien Brody and Sarah Polley weren’t anywhere near as compelling. However, they grew on me as the film went on, and I ended up liking both of their performances a lot.

The movie picks up steam once Dren enters the picture. It’s funny, because Dren isn’t a particularly compelling character herself. I mean, she’s a new life form, and so she should be compelling, but somehow she’s not. The reason the movie gets better once Dren appears is that she affects change in both Clive and Elsa. Because of Dren, Clive and Elsa go through some dramatic changes, and it is through these changes that their characters really become deeper and more interesting.

LS: I don’t agree. I liked Dren a lot. But I agree that she affects Clive and Elsa in interesting ways.

(Another creature rises up out of the cooking pot. This time it’s a muscular little man, without a shirt, who starts doing all kinds of posing on the tabletop)

LS: Oh no, it’s a tiny Taylor Lautner!

MA: Who?

LS: You forgot so soon? The werewolf kid from TWILIGHT: NEW MOON. All he likes to do is show off his abs.

MA: I know who he is. I was just trying to block him out of my mind.  What’s the idea, anyway?  Of all the characters to conjure up, why him?

LS (lifts a large sledgehammer): Oh well, all experiments can’t be successful.

(TINY TAYLOR LAUTNER suddenly begins to transform into a lame-looking CGI wolf)

LS (brings down hammer): Oh no you don’t! (Sounds of whimpering, then silence)

MA: Well, back to the review. At first, Elsa loves Dren like a baby daughter, and Clive, realizing the potential trouble their new creation could cause, wants to kill it. Then, as we learn more about Elsa’s deceased mom and how awful she treated her– and when they return to Elsa’s childhood farmhouse we see her old bedroom, which looks like something right out of PSYCHO (1960)—we realize her feelings towards Dren are more complicated than simple maternal instincts.

LS: I wished they had expanded a bit on Elsa’s childhood. For once, flashbacks could have added to the emotional impact of the story. That bedroom is very disturbing, but we see it so fleeting that it doesn’t really register at first.

MA: Later, Elsa becomes harsh with Dren, and you get the feeling she’s acting like her own mother. When Dren reacts and tries to harm Elsa, Elsa strikes back by treating her inhumanely, like a lab experiment, stripping her of her clothes and dignity, and even maiming her.

At this point, it’s Clive who begins to relate to Dren, to become sympathetic towards her, which leads to that human/monster sex scene you were talking about.  All joking aside, it’s a really neat scene.

LS: Oh, it’s definitely one of the movie’s highlights.

MA: At one point, Clive tells Elsa that she didn’t want kids of her own because she was afraid she’d lose control, but she was happy to have a lab experiment as a child, because she would have complete control over that. It’s a telling moment in the movie, because we learn why Elsa was so driven to create Dren in the first place.

The movie really takes an intelligent approach to its science fiction tale. It could have been superficial and cliché, but it’s not. It’s actually character-driven, as the tale of Dren unfolds through the actions and behaviors of Clive and Elsa.

However, it’s far from perfect. Take Dren, for instance. While I really enjoyed her look, she never becomes the character she had the potential for becoming. She’s a new life form, for crying out loud!  She should be fascinating!  Instead, she’s mildly interesting.

LS: I disagree. I think Dren is actually my favorite character in the movie, and Delphine Chaneac does a great job bringing her to life. The actress who plays her as a little girl (Abigail Chu) is quite good, too. But Chanéac makes her completely sympathetic, without uttering a single human word.

MA:  I guess. I’m with you in terms of the way she looked. I thought she was cool-looking, but in terms of her character, I wanted to get inside her head more. I don’t think I felt her pain as much as I felt the pain of the two leads. But I liked her much more than THE HUMAN CENTIPEDE!

LS:  Don’t start that again, or you might find yourself in one of these test tubes!

MA: And to nitpick here, her name Dren is “nerd” spelled backwards. I don’t know why, but while watching the scene when they named her Dren, my mind suddenly experienced a flashback to the 1976 KING KONG when Jessica Lange explains her name Dwan as “Dawn with two letters reversed.”  Ugh!

LS: The scene where Elsa gives Dren her name is kinda goofy, but it’s not that bad, and it makes enough sense that you can let it go.

MA: There were a few memorable scenes, but not a whole lot. I thought the initial birthing scene where both the baby Dren and Elsa nearly die was rather flat and not all that dramatic. The scene where Dren makes her first appearance was much better. There’s also a neat scene later in the movie when Clive and Elsa are making this huge presentation for their company, Newstead, and they’re in front of a huge audience of business types and scientists. They’re supposed to be showing off Fred and Ginger, but the two creations decide to attack each other, eventually spraying the shocked audience with a shower of blood. It’s a sick, funny scene, that had the audience I saw it with laughing.

LS: That was a fantastic scene! And does some major foreshadowing about what’s to come.

MA: Yeah, they weren’t laughing to make fun of it, they were laughing because it was a cool scene!

But for the most part this movie is not about high drama. For example, when Dren escapes at the farmhouse, I thought the film might go the monster movie melodrama route about some strange creature loose in the countryside. It doesn’t, which actually is a good thing. SPLICE remains a methodical thought-provoking science fiction thriller throughout.

There’s a sense of sadness which pervades this movie. Dren is a sad, tragic character, and the film does a good job capturing this feeling.

LS: I definitely agree about the atmosphere of sadness that seems to hang over everything. It’s very effective.

MA: And the moment when Clive tells Dren that they love her, and they embrace, is one of the more emotional scenes in a movie that isn’t really all that emotional, other than that feeling of sadness.

The best part by far is the relationship between Clive and Elsa. They seem very real, and the way they interact and the things they say to each other are very realistic.

As you said, the weakest part of SPLICE is its ending, which was predictable and blah, and really, had the movie had a stronger ending, I probably would be much more enthusiastic about it.

As it is, I found SPLICE surprisingly adult and realistic, a thought-provoking science fiction thriller that’s smart and enjoyable, but ultimately a film that lacks the heightened drama or horror that could really put it over the edge and take it to the next level. I also give it 2 ½ knives.

So, I guess we’re in agreement on this one.

Hey, is that sauce ready yet?

LS:  Almost. It’s just missing one key ingredient.

MA:  What’s that?

LS:  Head of critic.

MA:  Head of critic?  You mean—?

LS:  Nah!  Not you!  Who would I get to prove wrong week after week?  (Opens pot, then begins to unwrap a parcel of butcher’s paper.)

MA:  That’s huge. How many heads do you have in there?

(LS unwraps parcel to reveal— the heads of STATLER and WALDORF from THE MUPPET SHOW)

STATLER:  Hey, can you believe these guys?  Passing themselves off as critics!

WALDORF:  Well, they’re definitely not cooks, either!  They can’t even boil water!  They’re burning the place down!

LS: Oh shut up, you two!

(Flames shoot out from underneath the pot).

LS:  Oops. Too much gas.

MA:  No comment. That does it until next week, folks. See you, then!

—END—

© Copyright 2010 by Michael Arruda and L.L. Soares

Both Michael and LL give this movie 2 1/2 KNIVES:

Cinema Knife Fight – Coming Attractions for JUNE 2010

Posted in 2010, Cinema Knife Fights, Coming Attractions with tags , , , , , , , on June 3, 2010 by knifefighter

by Michael Arruda and L.L. Soares

(THE SCENE:  It’s the wild, wild west.  A vast desert-like prairie, with enormous cacti in the foreground, and a rocky mountain in the background, a scene worthy of director John Ford.  Into the scene ride two men on horseback, dressed in cowboy gear, and a close-up of the two men reveal them to be MICHAEL ARRUDA and L.L. SOARES.  The men pull up on the reigns and bring the horses to a halt.)

MA:  Whoa.  Good horse.

(A huge man on a tiny horse suddenly rides into scene and joins them.)

MAN:  Gee, thanks!  What did I do, anyway?

MA (rolls eyes.):  No.  I said “good horse,” not “good Hoss.”

MAN (blushing):  Oh.  Sorry about that.  (He rides off as BONANZA theme plays.)

LS:  Another joke for the old-timers.  I wonder how many of our readers even know what BONANZA was?

MA:  I don’t know, but I bet there are lots of folks who know the theme song but don’t know anything about the old TV show.  Good old Hoss was a character on that show, which was a western, by the way.  Anyway, I reckon this is as good a place as any to start our Coming Attractions column for June.

LS:  I reckon it is, I reckon!

MA:  We’re here in the wild west because later on in June we’ll be reviewing the horror western, JONAH HEX, which is probably the film I’m looking forward to most this month.  This isn’t saying a whole lot since I’m not all that excited about June’s new releases.

LS:  You mean you’re not excited about SPLICE, which we’ll be reviewing on June 4th?

MA:  Not really.

LS:  Aww, come on, the trailer actually looked interesting. Adrien Brody and Sarah Polley play scientists who create a clone, but because they can’t make a human clone legally, they mix human and animal DNA to get around the law. Looks like the creature they create might be a little bit dangerous. It looks like a rip-off of SPECIES (1995), but it could be good.

MA:  I agree that the trailer for this one look good, but I’m still not all that excited by it.  It kinda looks like an evil AVATAR movie.  I certainly hope it has more of a story than THE HUMAN CENITPEDE, which I know you liked a lot, but to me, it was just an excuse to feature a horrifying scientific experiment.  There wasn’t much of a story there.

I hope SPLICE is a better drama.

LS:  No reason why you have to use the June Preview column to bash THE HUMAN CENTIPEDE, which we already reviewed. But I betcha SPLICE isn’t even half as cool.

So then, on June 11, we’ll be reviewing TRICK R’ TREAT (2008), now on DVD.

This one is an anthology movie featuring a handful of scary stories that take place on Halloween. Despite the fact that it got a lot of positive buzz by people in the know, it never got a theatrical release and went straight to DVD. But it was given theatrical release dates at least twice, even though it never hit theaters. Why did it sit on the shelf so long? This one also has a solid cast that includes Brian Cox and Anna Paquin of TRUE BLOOD fame.

MA:  I have to admit, I know very little about this movie.  From what I’ve read about it, it sounds like it has a good story anyway.  Looks like there’s a lot going on.

On June 18, we’ll review JONAH HEX, a new horror western with comic book origins.  Now, while the trailers haven’t blown me away, not by a long shot, I am still looking forward to this one.

It’s got a decent cast, led by Josh Brolin in the lead, and it also stars Megan Fox and John Malkovich.  So, you have some star power here.  Malkovich is an intriguing actor, always good for an unconventional performance, and Megan Fox— well, we like to use the term eye candy in this column.  She’s some serious eye candy.

LS: When it comes to candy, she’s Godiva chocolate, man!

MA: But I’m also a big fan of westerns, so that in itself has me looking forward to this one.  Plus, there’s been a long history over the years of mixing the genres, and while there really hasn’t been a true classic of this hybrid genre, there have been notable movies, films like Ray Harryhausen’s VALLEY OF GWANGI (1969), which was basically the story of KING KONG (1933) retold in the wild west and substituting a T-Rex for Kong.

There’s also a low-budget black and white vampire western called CURSE OF THE UNDEAD (1959) which in spite of its low budget has some good moments, and then there’s the sci fi western WESTWORLD (1973) starring Yul Brynner and— James Brolin, who happens to be Josh Brolin’s dad.

LS: I dig all three of those movies. And CURSE OF THE UNDEAD is kind of a forgotten gem. Maybe you can review it for your IN THE SPOOKLIGHT column sometime.

MA: Of course, the absolute worst of the bunch, in the “it’s so bad it’s hilarious” category is the John Carradine debacle BILLY THE KID VS. DRACULA (1966).

So, there’s some history here in terms of the western/horror genre.

LS:  Yeah, JONAH HEX is based on the classic DC Comics character, a man left disfigured and for dead, who seeks vengeance. There are some supernatural elements along the way. Even the great Joe R. Lansdale wrote a few JONAH HEX comics over the years. I hope this movie tries to capture the feel of his “weird western” stuff.

(MA & LS ride towards cave, but stop as they hear wailing and screaming.)

LS:  What’s that?

MA:  That looks like a crowd of hardcore horror fans.  They’re absolutely horrified by the film coming out on June 30.

LS:  You mean TWILIGHT: ECLIPSE?

(MA SCREAMS!)

MA:  Sorry, I just cannot help myself. Yep, it’s the third installment of the TWILIGHT series.  Out already. Can’t they slow things down a bit and take a page out of the George Lucas school of filmmaking, and maybe release these flicks three years apart as opposed to every few months?  I still haven’t shaken all that boredom out of my system!

Now, I know there are a good number of people who love these movies, and that’s okay.  I have nothing against a vampire love story.  Really, I don’t.  It’s not my favorite thing, but at the end of the day, if it was a good movie, I’d say so.  That second film in the series, NEW MOON (2009), was so incredibly boring and slow that the butter on my popcorn solidified.

I expect more of the same from TWILIGHT:  ECLIPSE, but I’ll keep an open mind just in case.

LS:  You have some nerve complaining. I’m the one who had to sit through the first TWILIGHT (2008) movie by myself and review it for this site, before NEW MOON came out. So I knew what we were in for, and yet, like a runaway train, I couldn’t stop it. Considering that NEW MOON was actually a lot worse than the first movie, I can only say I am really dreading the third one!

To have a TWILIGHT movie coming up to review – that is what real horror feels like.

MA:  That about wraps things up from here.  Time to ride back to the lab and get ready for SPLICE.

(A great roar is heard, as a Ray Harryhausen-animated TYRANNOSAURUS REX appears.)

LS: Hey look, it’s Marc Bolan! (to T. REX ) What are you looking at?

T. REX:  DINNER!

MA:  Funny you should say that, because we were just about to call it a day and grab a bite to eat.  Care to join us?

LS: I’m having a flashback to the beginning of the FLINTSTONES when Fred used to order those gigantic dinosaur spare ribs (licks his lips)

T. REX (roars louder):  DINNER!

MA:  I think his mind is made up.

LS:  Look! (points behind T.REX)  It’s Megan Fox!

(T-REX’s eyes nearly burst out of their sockets, and he turns around expectantly, but no one is there.)

(Cut to MA & LS racing their horses across plain, with T-REX in hot pursuit.)

MA & LS:  We’ll see you next time with our review of SPLICE.

T.REX (bellowing and holding its stomach): DINNER!

—-END—-

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 80 other followers