Archive for Red Riding Hood

MONSTROUS QUESTION: WHAT’S WRONG WITH WEREWOLVES? (ANSWER # 1)

Posted in 2011, Monstrous Question, Nick Cato Reviews, Philisophical Discussions, Werewolf Movies, Werewolves with tags , , , , , on April 26, 2011 by knifefighter

MONSTROUS QUESTION: WHAT’S WRONG WITH WEREWOLVES? – ANSWER # 1 – NICK CATO

(Monstrous Question provided by Michael Arruda)

We’re going to get deep and philosophical on tonight’s MONSTROUS QUESTION.  Ready?

While watching the recent RED RIDING HOOD (2011), a movie about a werewolf, it got me to thinking:  why is it that werewolves just haven’t made it big in the movies?

Sure, we’ve had the classics like THE WOLF MAN (1941) starring Lon Chaney Jr., followed by Chaney’s numerous appearances as Larry Talbot aka the Wolf Man in the Universal sequels, but what else have we had?

Hammer Films made only one werewolf movie THE CURSE OF THE WEREWOLF (1961). We saw AN AMERICAN WEREWOLF IN LONDON and THE HOWLING series in the 1980s, and recently we had the well-received remake of THE WOLFMAN (2010), but compared to vampires, and now zombies, werewolves just haven’t taken off.  Why?

That’s tonight’s MONSTROUS QUESTION:  What’s wrong with the werewolf as a movie monster?  Why hasn’t he ever been as popular as other monsters, such as vampires and zombies?

***

FROM NICK CATO:

 I think people identify more easily with vampires than with werewolves.  With vampires, who wouldn’t want the power to seduce your prey and have super-human strength?  And when the night’s over, you don’t have to worry about waking up naked in the middle of the woods with your clothes torn to shreds.  Vampires are also usually cool and in control, something werewolves are not.

And while I doubt anyone would want to be a zombie, zombies are a nightmarish version of what may be waiting beyond the grave, and despite the goofiness of most zombie films, the whole concept is terrifying (whether we want to admit it or not).  They are us in a new, permanent, decaying state.  Whereas vampires are the creatures horror fans fantasize about being, zombies are the things we fear becoming.  They’re the ultimately loved and ultimately feared creatures.

Werewolves are somewhere in the middle of this: while it’d be cool to be able to transform at will, traditional werewolves are at the mercy of a full moon (almost like being the employee of an annoying boss), and as mentioned, have very little control over their situation.   Perhaps werewolves have never received the love vamps and zombies have due to our own control issues.

—END—

RED RIDING HOOD

Posted in 2011, Horror, Michael Arruda Reviews, Monsters, Werewolf Movies with tags , , , , , , , on March 22, 2011 by knifefighter

MOVIE REVIEW:  RED RIDING HOOD (2011)
By Michael Arruda

 

 

I’m embarrassed to admit this, but I liked RED RIDING HOOD. I liked it a lot.

Oh, I REALLY wanted to hate it. I wanted it to be a TWILIGHT clone, just as horribly boring and painful, and since it was directed by Catherine Hardwicke, the woman who directed the first TWILIGHT movie, I figured it would be. I certainly didn’t want to be the only critic in the world singing this movie’s praises, but in this business you gotta tell the truth, and the truth is, there’s a lot to like about RED RIDING HOOD.

We all could have been saved a lot of trouble had the filmmakers decided not to make a movie about Red Riding Hood but just about a werewolf terrorizing a medieval village instead. I mean, why in the world would any adult want to make a movie about Little Red Riding Hood that wasn’t a kid’s movie?  What were they thinking?  Truth be told, the WORST part about RED RIDING HOOD is its title, and I think a lot of people might not be able to get past the fact that they’re watching a story based on a well-known fairy tale. It’s based on Little Red Riding Hood, so it must be stupid!  Well, it’s not.

Forget about the name “Red Riding Hood,” and what you have is a movie about a medieval village terrorized by a savage monstrous werewolf. That’s not such a bad story.

And that’s one of the strengths of this movie. It tells a good story.

In a medieval village in some picturesque unnamed mountainous location, Valerie (Amanda Seyfried) is in love with Peter (Shiloh Fernandez) but her marriage has been arranged, and she is to marry Henry (Max Irons), since he’s wealthier than the lowly Peter, who is just an orphaned woodcutter. Fate intervenes when Valerie’s sister is murdered by the werewolf that’s been terrorizing the village for years.

In frustration, the men of the village decide to take it upon themselves to hunt down and kill the werewolf once and for all. The men do indeed hunt down and kill a wolf, but Henry’s father is a casualty of the hunt and is killed by the wolf.

Just as the village is about to celebrate, the famed werewolf hunter Solomon (Gary Oldman) arrives with his entourage of werewolf hunters, and he announces to the village that they have killed an ordinary wolf, that the werewolf is still at large. Solomon explains he knows about werewolves firsthand and their secret identities, because years before as he and his men went out to hunt a werewolf that had been terrorizing his village, he cut off the beast’s hand, and when he returned home, he found his wife bleeding to death, missing her hand.

He tells them the werewolf is still alive and most likely is one of the people living right there in their village.

The villagers basically tell Solomon to go to hell, that they’re going to party anyway, and they do. During the celebration, the werewolf does attack and kills a whole bunch of people, including some of Solomon’s men. The beast eventually escapes, but not before it corners Valerie and speaks to her—at least, Valerie understands its language, others only hear growls. The wolf tells her he wants to take her away with him into the countryside and make her into a creature like him.

When Solomon learns that Valerie communicated with the werewolf, he arrests her for witchcraft, a charge she doesn’t deny since she admits to understanding the werewolf. She also tells him what the wolf said to her, which gives Solomon the idea to use her as bait. Since the werewolf wants her, he will come for her.

And come for her he does. Valerie escapes and eventually finds her way to her grandmother’s house, and it is there, just as in the fairy tale, where the mystery is resolved, the werewolf’s identity is revealed, and Valerie’s fate is sealed.

I realize this movie is getting slammed by a lot of critics, but I have to tell you, I was entertained throughout, and when all was said and done, I really liked this one.

First off, RED RIDING HOOD looks terrific. Admittedly, I’m a sucker for period pieces, and the sets and costumes brought back memories of Hammer Films in their heyday, even though Hammer’s stories were primarily 19th century stories, and this one takes place during medieval times. RED RIDING HOOD looks better than SEASON OF THE WITCH (2011), which also took place during medieval times.

The costumes by Cindy Evans were excellent, as was the use of color and cinematography by Mandy Walker. Sure, a lot of the long shots of the village are CGI, but this is a fantasy, and the look really works here. The movie doesn’t suffer for it.

And yes, director Catherine Hardwicke directed the first TWILIGHT movie, and so the obvious comparisons must follow, but I’m here to tell you, as someone who suffered through those TWILIGHT movies, RED RIDING HOOD is much better than the films in that series. Sure, there are teens in love in both movies, but the characters in this one aren’t annoying. And stuff actually happens in this movie! It’s not boring.

I actually thought Hardwicke did a really good job at the helm. The werewolf scenes are actually pretty cool in this one, and the celebration scene, the feast where the villagers celebrate the “death” of the werewolf, was surprisingly erotic and reminded me of something you’d see in THE WICKER MAN (1973).

A lot has been made of the weak story, but I found the story pretty darn interesting, and I enjoyed the screenplay by David Johnson.  He also wrote ORPHAN, which was one of my favorite movies from 2009. I thought the mystery regarding the identity of the werewolf really worked here. The story does a good job of keeping you guessing. Nearly everyone Valerie comes in contact with is a suspect.

Speaking of Valerie, that’s another reason this movie is better than TWILIGHT. RED RIDING HOOD has Amanda Seyfried in the lead role. Seyfried, who we saw in CHLOE (2009) is beautiful, and she’s amazing to watch. She projects such a strong sexuality to her roles, she’s almost hypnotic. I could watch her act all day.

The rest of the cast is also very good. Gary Oldman as the tyrannical werewolf hunter Solomon – so driven he wears silver fingernails—provides his usual stellar performance. It’s nothing we haven’t seen him do before, but he’s damn good at it!

I thought both Shiloh Fernandez as Peter and Max Irons as Henry were very likeable. They were certainly more enjoyable to watch than Edward the vampire and the buff shirtless werewolf, Jacob, from the TWILIGHT series.

Julie Christie was excellent as grandmother, as were Billy Burke (Bella’s dad from TWILIGHT) as Valerie’s dad and Virginia Madsen (THE HAUNTING IN CONNECTICUT (2009)] as her mom. Lukas Haas also stood out as Father Auguste, the young priest who at first admires Solomon but soon grows wary of his overzealous methods. I was really surprised by how interesting all these characters were.

Now, the werewolf itself— yes, it’s CGI created, and no, it’s not quite as good as what we saw in THE WOLFMAN (2010), but it is much better than the cutesy creatures we saw in TWILIGHT. This werewolf is even a little scary, and to be honest, in a story like this, based on the Red Riding Hood fairy tale, the look of beast works.

A talking werewolf could have been incredibly awful, but its mouth doesn’t move, and so it doesn’t play like a character in a kids’ movie.

I also really enjoyed the music score by Alex Heffes and Brian Reitzell. It was lively, haunting, and erotic, all in the right places.

RED RIDING HOOD is not hardcore horror. But it is an entertaining well-made movie that tells a compelling story about a monstrous werewolf terrorizing a medieval village, has likeable characters, provides a decent mystery, and sports above-average special effects. I like a good werewolf story, and as werewolves stories go, RED RIDING HOOD is excellent.

—-END—

© Copyright 2011 by Michael Arruda

CKF Coming Attractions: March 2011!

Posted in 2011, Aliens, Coming Attractions, Werewolf Movies with tags , , , , , , , , , , , , on March 1, 2011 by knifefighter

CINEMA KNIFE FIGHT
COMING ATTRACTIONS: March 2011
by Michael Arruda and L.L. Soares

(The Scene: The streets of Los Angeles. Pandemonium is everywhere. People are running through the streets. Military vehicles and soldiers are firing into the sky, and giant alien spaceships are returning the favor. The camera pans to the window of a coffee shop, and through the window we go inside, with the camera settling on MICHAEL ARRUDA and L.L. SOARES at a table drinking coffee.)

MA (looking out window):  Yep, it looks like yet another alien invasion. I don’t know about you, but I’m getting tired of this storyline. We just had SKYLINE (2010) and MONSTERS (2010) last year.

LS:  Those are just two movies. How can you be tired of a storyline after two movies?

MA:  I guess because I didn’t like either movie.

LS:  That’s because you have no taste. MONSTERS was one of the better movies of 2010.

MA:  Anyway, before we get to this latest invasion, from BATTLE: LOS ANGELES, which opens March 11, we have to cover a couple of other movies. The first is THE ADJUSTMENT BUREAU (2011) which opens on March 4.

THE ADUSTMENT BUREAU is a thriller starring Matt Damon about a secret group of men in suits who control our destiny, and it involves a love affair between a politician and a ballerina. In short, this one sounds plain stupid, and I don’t have high hopes for it.

(Outside the window, a politician and a ballerina run by, pursued by a group of men in suits, in fast motion.)

MA:  That’s what I’m talking about.

Anyway, I like Matt Damon a lot, but I’m not sure if his presence alone will be able to save what looks to be a troubled production. Rumor has it that this one has gone through multiple rewrites and delayed release dates.

It’s written and directed by George Nolfi, who wrote THE BOURNE ULTIMATUM (2007) and the Michael Douglas thriller THE SENTINEL (2006), which a lot of people didn’t like, but I thought it was pretty good. THE ADJUSTMENT BUREAU is based on a Philip K. Dick short story called “Adjustment Team” so it does have this in its favor.

LS:  I’m a big Philip K. Dick fan. Some good movies have been based on his work, especially BLADE RUNNER (1982). But there have been bad movies adapted from his stories as well. THE ADJUSTMENT BUREAU looks pretty boring to me. And I’m not a big Matt Damon fan.

MA:  Okay, moving on to what promises to be perhaps the biggest release of March, BATTLE:  LOS ANGELES (2011). This one’s got a very stylish trailer, and it’s about yet another battle between humans and aliens. I generally like this storyline, but I’m getting tired of it. I certainly hope this one delivers the goods.

It does have a good cast, which includes Aaron Eckhart, Michelle Rodriguez, and Bridget Moynahan. This is one that I certainly WANT to like, but a lot will depend on how well the story is written. I’m sure it’ll look great with smooth special effects, but whether a film makes that jump to the next level often depends on the strength of its story.

LS:  You’re right, though, that it looks an awful lot like another movie we saw recently, SKYLINE. If we judge the movie on its trailer, BATTLE LOS ANGELES looks very similar. I hope that’s not the case. I hope it gives us something different.

MA:  Also coming out on March 11 is RED RIDING HOOD (2011). I had absolutely no interest in this one. I mean, who wants to see a movie about Little Red Riding Hood?

(Three little pigs run by the coffee shop window, pursued by a big, bad wolf.)

MA:  I guess it could be worse.

Anyway, I wasn’t into seeing this one at all, until that is I saw its trailer, which I have to admit has piqued my interest, and has me actually looking forward to seeing this one now. The movie looks pretty cool. It’s got some impressive photography and makes great use of the color red, at least in the trailer, anyway.

Amanda Seyfried who I like a lot is playing the lead role, Valerie, aka Red Riding Hood. We saw her in CHLOE (2009) and JENNIFER’S BODY (2009). And Gary Oldman is on hand as Father Solomon, and he looks to be a nasty werewolf hunter.

In spite of the fact that the movie is named RED RIDING HOOD, it looks like an atmospheric werewolf movie, one that I’m looking forward to seeing. I guess this really shouldn’t come as a surprise, since LITTLE RED RIDING HOOD, the fairy tale, really is a werewolf story, too.

It’s written by David Johnson, who also wrote the screenplay for ORPHAN (2009), a movie I liked a lot. The only knock on this one is it’s directed by Catherine Hardwicke. What’s the knock?  Well, she directed TWILIGHT (2008).

(Bella and Edward run by the window. LS & MA break window and start hurling donuts at the fleeing couple.)

LS:  The trailer looks interesting, but it also looks like the werewolf is a teenager. It looks like yet another variation on the TWILIGHT concept. So I’m not that interested. Even though I do like Seyfried and Oldman.

On March 18 we’ll be reviewing PAUL (2011). At first, I thought it was the new movie by Edgar Wright, who gave us SHAUN OF THE DEAD (2004) and HOT FUZZ (2007). But Wright is nowhere around. It’s directed by Greg Motolla, who also directed SUPERBAD (2007). But the stars, Simon Pegg and Nick Frost, were also the stars of SHAUN and FUZZ.

PAUL is a movie about a couple of idiots who pick up an alien named Paul, who has escaped from the legendary Area 51. The character of Paul is CGI and looks like he could get a bit cutesy as the movie goes on. However, this one is rated R, so maybe it will surprise us and not be as silly as the trailer suggests.

MA:  Yeah, I loved SHAUN OF THE DEAD, and I’m looking forward to PAUL.

That being said, the trailer didn’t blow me away by any means. It didn’t look as funny as I thought it would be. I hope there are funnier jokes in the movie than in the trailer.

LS:  And we’ll finish the month with SUCKER PUNCH (2011) which opens on March 25. This one’s about a girl sent to a sanitarium who escapes into a fantasy world. Except it looks like some of the other patients join her in this world, where they have a quest that will lead them to freedom. SUCKER PUNCH is directed by Zack Snyder, who gave us the so-so remake of DAWN OF THE DEAD (2004), as well as the comic book movies, 300 (2006) and WATCHMEN (2009). He’s made interesting enough films so far that I want to give SUCKER PUNCH a chance, even though the trailer didn’t wow me.

MA:  I’ve got mixed feelings about this one. I mean, the trailer’s pretty good, and the story looks fairly interesting, but if the action scenes don’t hold up, this one could be a disappointment. The story of girls in an institution using an alternate reality as a coping strategy doesn’t do much for me. It seems kinda lame. This one might be a mixed bag.

And yes, the fact that it’s directed by Zack Snyder is a plus.

Well, this about wraps things up here.

LS:  Yes, it does. (to audience):  We’ll see all of you in March at the movies!

(MA & LS pay the bill, then exit restaurant. On the street, they watch the horde of screaming fleeing people run by them. They look at each other, shrug their shoulders, and then join the running and screaming crowd, disappearing into the night.)

—END—

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 88 other followers