Archive for mickey rourke

IMMORTALS

Posted in 2011, 3-D, Action Movies, Barbarian Movies, Fantasy, Highly Stylized Films, LL Soares Reviews with tags , , , , , , , on November 15, 2011 by knifefighter

IMMORTALS (2011)
Movie Review by L.L. Soares

So, I had seen the trailer for IMMORTALS a few times and had zero expectations for this film. It looked like a rip-off of Zach Snyder’s 300 (2006), with some CLASH OF THE TITANS (2010) thrown in for good measure. In other words, there was a chance this one could be a snoozefest. But then I found out that Tarsem Singh directed it, and I was suddenly curious to see it.

For those of you who aren’t familiar with the name, Tarsem Singh is the guy who directed THE CELL (2000), about people entering the mind of a serial killer. It was visually fascinating, and starred Jennifer Lopez (in one of her few good movies) and Vincent D’Onofrio as the comatose killer. It wasn’t a perfect movie, but it had some pretty striking imagery. His second film, THE FALL (2006), continued to mark him as a director with a unique vision (Read Dan Keohane’s review of THE FALL here). And now we’ve got IMMORTALS.

It goes without saying that this movie is great to look at.  That’s what Singh is all about. But what about the story?

Well, it’s kind of a mixture of original ideas and Greek mythology. It all begins with a battle between the gods and the Titans. The Titans are exiled to earth after they lose the war – encased in a big metal block and held together with steel rods.

Cut to King Hyperion (Mickey Rourke), who despises the gods since they did nothing to save his wife and child from death. In retaliation, he dons a mask, builds an army of savage warriors and decides to sweep the earth, slaughtering all those who oppose him. His ultimate plan, however, is to find the fabled Epiurus Bow (that creates its own exploding arrows!) and free the Titans, so they can wreck their vengeance on the same gods Hyperion despises so much.

The hero of this piece is Theseus (Henry Cavill, who is currently filming THE MAN OF STEEL, due out in 2013, wherein he will play Superman), a peasant with a will of iron and muscles to match, who is an outcast among his own people. When he sees his mother killed in front of him by Hyperion, he vows revenge of his own.

But Theseus isn’t just any muscle-bound peasant. He’s a favorite of the gods, Zeus (Luke Evans) in particular. In this film, the gods look like a bunch of Calvin Klein models lounging around in the clouds, watching humankind below.

While the gods watch Theseus’s every move, they are vowed to stay out of the affairs of humans (breaking this rule is supposed to bring them death), unless the Titans are released again, and you can see where everything comes full circle.

Along the way, Theseus comes upon a virgin oracle, Phaedra (Freida Pinto), who can see the future, and who becomes his love interest, and Stavros (Stephen Dorff), a thief who becomes Theseus’s right hand man.

There are a lot of battle scenes, either characters fighting one another, or armies clashing, and they’re all done pretty well. They’re also pretty gory. By the time you start wondering why this movie is rated R, you’ll suddenly notice heads getting splattered with sledgehammers and bodies getting cut in half by swords, and realize that this movie earned its rating with blood.

In deference to actual mythology, there’s even a scene in a labyrinth, and a minotaur of sorts for Theseus to battle. I actually thought this was an interesting take on the story, because instead of an actual minotaur with the head of a bull, we get a giant of a man who wears a barbed-wire mask in the shape of a bull. Hyperion refers to him as “The Beast” (Robert Maillet) and at one point sends him off to kill Theseus. The resulting battle is very well done. In another bull reference, the Beast, when we first see him, tends to a fire beneath a giant iron bull, which we just know is a pressure cooker used to cook prisoners alive, long before someone actually cracks it open to find out.

Singh does it all with a very painterly touch. Much like 300, it’s CGI used to create an entire world, but Singh is a much more creative director than Zack Snyder, so the images and story are a bit more interesting this time. I thought it started out a little slow, but once we get to the action scenes, it livens up immensely. Mickey Rourke does an enjoyable job playing the heavy in this one. Cavill is serviceable enough as a Spartacus wannabe. And Pinto does a good job of standing around and looking pretty.

Like other movies of its ilk, the story of IMMORTALS is its weakest link. But it made something like the remake of CLASH OF THE TITANS look even weaker in comparison. Mythology, it seems, is hot again, and so far Singh has given us the best recent movie version.

This one is also in theaters in both 3D and 2D versions. I saw it in 3D, and it was fine, but 3D still fails to astound me, and I’m sure it would have been just as dazzling to look at in 2D. So save your money if you can.

I’m on the fence about what kind of rating to give this one. I’m waffling between giving it two and a half knives and three knives, and it basically comes down to, if this kind of movie sounds good to you, check it out, and if you’re not so sure, wait for the rental version.

IMMORTALS is a decent enough film, but no masterpiece. Which isn’t to say that Tarsem Singh isn’t capable of making great movies. He’s someone I plan to keep my eye on. In the meantime, even his flawed films are worth seeing.

© Copyright 2011 by L. L. Soares

L.L. Soares gives IMMORTALS ~ two and a half knives (or three knives, depending on his mood)

(Note: The horror movie 11-11-11 was also due out this weekend – as mentioned in this month’s “COMING ATTRACTIONS” column, but it must have been in very limited release, since none of our staff was able to find it.)

THE EXPENDABLES

Posted in 2010, Action Movies, John Harvey Reviews, Just Plain Fun with tags , , , , , , on August 17, 2010 by knifefighter

THE EXPENDABLES … It’s Action/Adventure Porn!
Review by John Harvey

If you’ve been reading any of the film reviews of Sylvester Stallone’s 1980s-style throwback to the golden era of cheeseball action/adventure films, THE EXPENDABLES, then you know that the reviews fall into one of two categories.

Either the reviewer loved the movie because it’s nothing but guns, explosions, bravado, explosions, one-liners, boobs, explosions, testosterone, fistfights and then some REALLY BIG EXPLOSIONS

… or the reviewer hated the movie because it’s nothing but guns, explosions, bravado, explosions, one-liners, boobs, explosions, testosterone, fistfights, and then some REALLY BIG EXPLOSIONS.

So, it appears that we’re all agreement. THE EXPENDABLES is nothing but explosions, bravado, explosions, etc., etc., and so on. And really, what do you expect when you put Sylvester Stallone, Jason Statham, Jet Li, Dolph Lundgren, Terry Crews, Mickey Rourke, Randy Couture,   Stone Cold Steve Austin, Bruce Willis and Arnold Schwarzenegger in the same movie? A sequel to THE REMAINS OF THE DAY (1993)?

This movie is what would happen if I was 10 years-old and my parents gave me a well-funded film studio for Christmas. It is an entirely juvenile romp through all the best (and lovably worst) action film tropes and gimmicks that were exemplified by the The Cannon Group films in the 1980s.

Here’s the gist of the plot. Stallone and his muscle-bound buddies make up a mercenary team hired to overthrow a South American dictator (David Zayas) and the American drug lord (Eric Roberts) who finances his operation. But really … who cares?

If you’re going to enjoy this movies, then you see it for the popcorn-chomping cheap thrills, nostalgia, chuckles and acts of violence and mayhem that zoom well past the borders of being ludicrous. That’s what I went for, and I came away entirely satisfied. All the actors play (and overact) their roles admirably and with many  winks to the audience. While THE EXPENDABLES may not win any Oscars for acting, Stallone should get some sort of trophy for herding that many big egos into one film and churning out something fun to watch.

Is the movie without flaws? No. Remember that THE EXPENDABLES is built on a gimmick rather than an original concept, so certain scenes and sub-plots fall flat because there’s no framework to hold up anything resembling real storytelling. In addition, Stallone used a lot of quick cuts and other camera tricks to juice up the physically-demanding fight scenes and obscure the simple fact that many of the stars are … well … old.

Also, while there’s been tons of hoopla about the HUGE cast of action/adventure stars in this film, the bulk of THE EXPENDABLES’ screen time belongs to Stallone and Statham. After that, Dolph Lundgren, Jet Li, and Mickey Rourke fall in the “distant second” category. Most of the other featured names are window dressing, while Willis and Schwarzenegger share a one-scene cameo with Stallone.

I have to admit, I had a lot of fun watching Lundgren … err … act in this film. He’s a dreadful actor (though probably smarter than the rest of the cast combined … See Footnote 1), but you can tell that he knows it and doesn’t mind. This makes watching his performance oddly endearing. I also found it humorous and a little surreal to see Mickey Rourke taking up the Obi Wan Kenobi persona in THE EXPENDABLES.

Ultimately, THE EXPENDABLES was great fun and perfectly suited for viewing on the big screen (many awe-inspiring fireballs). It reminds us that low-concept films don’t have to default to being bad movies, as long as you can appreciate them solely at face value. Movies like this need to be taken in as a whole. Once you start nit-picking at the details (like, you know, logic and physics), then that’s the moment when you start missing the point.

For example, if pressed, what do I think would have made THE EXPENDABLES a much better movie? Honestly … more boobs.

Directed by: Sylvester Stallone

Written by: Dave Callaham and Sylvester Stallone

Starring: Sylvester Stallone, Jason Statham, Jet Li, Dolph Lundgren, Terry Crews, Mickey Rourke, Randy Couture, Eric Roberts, David Zayas, Stone Cold Steve Austin, Bruce Willis, and Arnold Schwarzenegger.

Rating: R

Run Time: 1hr 43min‎‎

***

Footnote 1: Not a lot of folks know this, but Dolph Lundgren has a huge brain. He holds a master’s degree in chemical engineering and was awarded a Fulbright Scholarship to the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. He speaks Swedish, English, German, French, Spanish, some Japanese, and some Italian.

– END -

© Copyright 2010 by John D. Harvey

IRON MAN 2

Posted in 2010, Cinema Knife Fights, Comic Book Movies, Sequels with tags , , , , , , , , , , , , , on May 10, 2010 by knifefighter

CINEMA KNIFE FIGHT: IRON MAN 2
By Michael Arruda and L.L. Soares

FADE IN

(THE SCENE: MICHAEL ARRUDA walks into a vast lab, full of machinery, to find L.L. SOARES asleep in Iron Man pajamas)

MA:  We’re gonna have to rename this column, CINEMA KNIFE SLEEP pretty soon.  Hey, wake up!

LS: Oh my god, it’s FREDDY KRUEGER again, come to kill me in my dreams! PLEASE DON’T KILL ME, FREDDY KRUEGER!

MA:   That was last week.  This week it’s just me.

LS: Oh, good……. I think.

MA: What are you sleeping again for? We have a movie to review.

LS: Because I just saw IRON MAN 2 and it lulled me to sleep.

MA:  Well, wake up!  ‘Cause you’re starting this one.

LS: Do I have to? This movie has like a hundred plots all going on at once.

MA:  Well, don’t put us to sleep by recounting each and every one!

LS:  A critic’s got to do what a critic’s got to do.

IRON MAN 2 is the much-awaited sequel to 2008’s very successful first IRON MAN film. At least I think it’s much-awaited. Personally, I could take it or leave it.

MA:  Those of us who loved the first movie were indeed eagerly awaiting this one.  However, those of us who have been watching movies for a zillion years know a thing or to about the success rate of sequels, so it wasn’t like I was holding my breath or anything.

LS: Make up your mind. Either you were eagerly awaiting this one, or you “weren’t holding your breath.” Which one is it? You talk in riddles.

MA (dressed as YODA):  Awaiting the movie I was, expecting much, not so.  Annoying you can be.

LS: If you were looking forward to this one so much, why don’t you start now?

MA:  And let you off the hook?  I don’t think so!

LS:  This time around, we start off with Ivan Vanko, a Russian ex-con who also happens to be a physics genius! When his father dies, he finds out that daddy used to work for Stark Enterprises (i.e. Tony Stark’s father, Howard Stark, shown here in old film footage and played by John Slattery from the show MAD MEN) and that Stark Sr. might have “appropriated” some of Ivan’s father’s plans for an alternate power source – which also happens to be part of Tony Stark’s Iron Man costume. Wanting revenge, Ivan starts to build a suit of his own.

Meanwhile, Tony not only has announced Iron Man’s identity to the world (“It’s me, folks!”), but he also goes before a Congressional subcommittee – led by wisecracking Senator Stern (Gary Shandling) – that wants to take his alter ego away from him to give to the military (it’s too powerful a weapon to leave to just one man). Tony refuses to hand the plans over, and his insistence on doing everything “his way” has made him something of a hero to thousands of adoring fans. He’s pretty much a rock star at this point.

But there’s a dark side. He’s dying and the metal “palladium” is the only thing keeping him alive (he uses it to power his breastplate – which is keeping his heart alive – but he’s going through more and more of the stuff every day, and it’s in limited supply). However, it’s also poisoning his blood – so he knows full well it’s only a matter of time before he dies. So he makes plans for when he’s gone. First by making his loyal “Girl Friday” Virginia “Pepper” Potts (Gwyneth Paltrow) the new CEO of Stark Enterprises, and by doing foolhardy things like kicking the driver of his racecar out so he can drive in the Gran Prix himself, even though he’s never done it before.

But good old Ivan shows ups to slice the car in two with his electric whips. And Iron Man faces yet another new villain out to kill him.

In the comics, this villain’s name was Whiplash (they never call him that here), and he looked nothing like Mickey Rourke does here. I could forgive the change of costume, but, really, the Whiplash in this movie really bears NO resemblance at all to the comic’s version (not just the costume).In the comics, his name wasn’t even the same – he was Mark Scarlotti. However, a character named Anton Vanko was Iron Man’s old enemy The Crimson Dynamo (who was a Cold War Russian version of Iron Man). Try to make sense of that!

MA (Dressed like a geek scientist in a white lab coat, disheveled hair, and oversized eyeglasses that hang helter-skelter across the bridge of his nose.  He stands in front of a chalkboard with a piece of chalk in hand.  The board is covered with scribble):  Let’s see, Whiplash was Mark Scarlotti, who is not Mickey Rourke, but Rourke is Ivan Vanko who is also Whiplash but not Scarlotti.  Then there’s Anton Vanko who is not Ivan Vanko, who’s Mickey Rourke, who is not Anton Vanko, who is the Crimson Dynamo.  By George, I’ve think we’ve got it!

LS:  Now if it was just Whiplash vs. Iron Man, or even If Whiplash teamed up with the Crimson Dynamo, that would have been a good plot. But there’s no way they were going to stop there. Other Marvel characters thrown into this stew include: Justin Hammer (Sam Rockwell) – a competitor of Stark’s in the weapons industry, who was ruthless in the comics, but is pretty much played for laughs here; Stark employee Natalie Rushman (who turns out to be Natasha Romanoff  – The Black Widow, a formidable spy and fighter played by Scarlett Johansson in the movie), who is really an undercover agent for Nick Fury (Samuel L. Jackson), head of the clandestine government agency S.H.I.E.L.D.

But that’s not all. Lt. Colonel James “Rhodey” Rhodes (Don Cheadle – he was played by Terence Fisher in the original movie) – Stark’s best friend – gets a hold of one of Stark’s earlier Iron Man costumes, which gets upgraded by Justin Hammer to become War Machine. And this doesn’t even include the tons of robot/drone Iron Men that Hammer creates and Ivan Vanko upgrades to attack Iron Man.

As you can see from the synopsis, there’s a lot going on in this movie. In fact, TOO MUCH. There are way too many characters jostling for screen time, and the plot, as it is, isn’t very compelling. In fact, for long stretches, this movie is downright boring, and I’m one of the people who enjoyed the first IRON MAN movie (and as a kid I even collected IRON MAN comics).

Even just explaining the storyline makes me want to take a nap!

MA:  I had less of a problem with the movie having multiple storylines and myriad characters than I did with the fact that none of the storylines really did all that much for me.  That and the pacing made the bulk of this movie as boring as you just said.

LS:  The best things in it are: Robert Downey Jr. again playing it to the hilt as cocky playboy Tony Stark. Sam Rockwell, an actor I always enjoy, does a tightrope walk as Justin Hammer – he’s supposed to be a worthy adversary to Stark but is pretty much treated as a joke here, but Rockwell does what he can with the role. Mickey Rourke is good here, too, but doesn’t get nearly enough screen time as the bad guy – mainly because he’s competing with so many other characters in the plot. And Johansson is actually pretty good as the Black Widow – but once again, isn’t given enough to do.

I wanted to like this movie. I thought the original IRON MAN was a fun movie and wanted this to be more of the same. But I really didn’t care for IRON MAN 2 overall, and can’t really bring myself to recommend it. What do you think, Michael?

MA: I’m with you.  I really enjoyed the first IRON MAN as well, a lot, but this one doesn’t even come close to measuring up.  I’ll start with the cast since you were just talking about them.

You mention Robert Downey Jr. as one of the best parts, but I have to disagree on that point.  Downey Jr. was probably my favorite part of IRON MAN. I thought his Tony Stark was an intriguing character, and his performance was a knock-out, way better than say, Christian Bale as Batman.

But in this one he just lacked something, and he failed to capture the same magic from the original.  I felt the same way about Gwyneth Paltrow as Pepper Potts.  All the chemistry they shared in the original was gone in this one.  I have to say I really didn’t enjoy either character in this movie.

LS: For some reason I never really cared for Paltrow as Pepper. But yeah, Downey’s good, but he’s not as good here as he was in the first one. It’s like he’s got Peter Parker Syndrome this time – too much ANGST.

MA: In Downey Jr.’s case, I’m not sure if it was his performance or the writing by screenwriter Justin Theroux.  It was as if they chose to do a movie on the worst week of Tony Stark’s life.  He thinks he’s dying, he’s upset about everything, it seems, and his behavior is erratic and all over the place.  It isn’t until the end of the movie that recaptures his persona from the first one.  Couldn’t they have chosen to write about Stark after all this happened so we could enjoy watching him do his Iron Man/confident wise guy Tony Stark shtick?  I just didn’t like his character in this one.

LS: Well, a major storyline in the comics was Tony Stark’s alcoholism, which is bound to be addressed in one of these sequels, so  things are definitely going in that direction.

MA: Don’t get me wrong.  Characters without problems are boring, but in this case, my point is, why ruin a good thing?  Downey Jr. had Tony Stark nailed in the first one, but in this one, with the angst over dying, he’s not the same guy.

I was also very disappointed with Mickey Rourke’s Ivan Vanko.  He looks great, creepy and frightening, but after he escapes from prison, he becomes— almost passive and boring.  He spends his time building robots, becoming almost a supporting player the rest of the way, which is too bad, because the guy’s a beast, and a brilliant one at that. He should be the central villain, but alas he’s reduced to lab work.  Ho hum.

I didn’t like Sam Rockwell as Justin Hammer at all.  I know his character wasn’t supposed to be likeable, but he should have been a little more sinister rather than a buffoon, which is how he comes off in this movie.

LS: I agree. I like Rockwell, but I don’t know why they wrote his character as such an idiot. I didn’t like that at all.

MA: By far, my favorite part of this movie was Scarlett Johansson as Natalie Rushman aka The Black Widow.  Her character was fresh, hard-hitting, and thoroughly enjoyable.  If I had to give one reason for seeing IRON MAN 2, it would be to see Johansson in action, but as you already pointed out, she’s not in it all that much, and so her performance alone is not enough to save this movie.  I like Johansson a lot, and her best performance in my mind remains in Woody Allen’s MATCH POINT (2005).

LS: I’d go so far as to say that Johansson’s character deserves her own movie, without all this clutter, so The Black Widow could really have a chance to shine.

MA:  I’d pay to see that.  I enjoyed both Don Cheadle (one of the best actors working today) and Samuel L. Jackson, but even more, I was impressed by Gary Shandling, of all people, as Senator Stern.  He’s a scene-stealer in the two scenes he’s in.

LS: Shandling was great! So was Sam Jackson as Nick Fury. He’s always good, and he brings the right amount of cockiness and authority to the role. But where’s the perpetual cigar in his mouth? Where’s the stubble? And most of all – where’s the damn S.H.I.E.L.D helicarrier? At least he’s a big improvement over David Hasslehoff who once played Nick Fury in an awful TV-movie that aired on the SyFy Channel!

MA: Director Jon Favreau, who also directed the first IRON MAN, doesn’t seem to give IRON MAN 2 the same pizzazz the first one had.  That first film possessed an edginess, a boldness, that is completely gone here.  It opens slowly, and picks up steam when it gets to the race car sequence that was heavily shown in the previews.

LS: Yep.

MA: Now, I was psyched about this, because it came so early in the movie, and I was feeling grateful that the previews didn’t spoil the ending.  I was excited that there would still be room for surprise.  Trouble was, nothing that followed that scene rivaled it.  I guess that’s why they showed it in the previews!

It also seemed like it took forever for Iron Man to show up in this movie!

I have to admit, I did enjoy the climactic battle with Iron Man, War Machine, and all the robot/drones.  Visually, it was fun to watch, but by that point, I really didn’t care all that much.  But far worse was the very ending, when Vanko returns to face off against Iron Man and War Machine.  It was like, “here we go.  Here comes the fun part!”  However, blink and you’ll miss their battle.

IRON MAN 2 really plays liked the clichéd sequel.  The characters are back from the first one, but the magic just isn’t there anymore, and when you leave the theater, you leave wishing you’d just watched the first one instead.  THE DARK KNIGHT, this ain’t.

LS: I do find it annoying when villains bear absolutely no similarity onscreen to who they are in the comics and this time around Whiplash is pretty much a totally different character than the original. In fact, the ONLY place he is referred to as Whiplash is in the end credits. I think a big part of this is vanity. Most actors do not want to wear a mask in their most important scenes. And Mickey Rourke is obviously no exception.  In fact, in the climactic battle with Iron Man and War Machine, Rourke goes throughout the whole fight with his FACE PLATE OPEN, so we can continue to see his face, even though this would leave him completely vulnerable in a fight. Talk about vanity! All Iron Man had to do was zap his head and he’d be toast! At least Downey and Cheadle get around this by having their faces shown “inside” their battle helmets.

There are way too many Iron Men this time around, too. Aside from Stark (the real Iron man) and Rhodes, we’ve got an army of robot Iron Men, and at the end even Ivan Vanko dons an Iron Man-type armored suit (something the comic book Whiplash would never have done).

And the fight scenes seemed to go on forever! Aside from the first appearance of Whiplash in Monte Carlo, the fight scenes were mostly a bore this time around.

MA (wearing an Iron Man Suit):  I actually thought the action scenes were pretty good.  I agree that the Monte Carlo race scene was the best, though.

LS:  Take that damn suit off!

MA:  I like the sleek look.

LS:  Also, stick around all the way to the end of the credits. Marvel Studios has pretty much made it mandatory to show one final scene at the ends of their movies after the credits are over. This time around, we get a teaser for the upcoming THOR movie, and while I am a big Thor fan (much more than Iron Man these days), I’M not even sure if it’s worth sticking around for.

MA:  No, it’ s not.  Just take it from us:  there’s a THOR teaser at the end.  Wait for the DVD and fast forward through the credits.  The credits go on for a long time anyway, and the choice of music isn’t that great.  Where the hell was Black Sabbath’s Iron Man?

LS: I didn’t hate all the music. They have at least two Clash songs on the soundtrack and lots of AC/DC. But yeah, Sabbath’s IRON MAN was sorely missing. Especially since they used it in the trailer.

For the most part, IRON MAN 2 was a snooze. I’d give it two knives.

MA:  I’d give it two knives, too.  While it’s not a complete bomb, in that at least its story makes sense, it’s not at all compelling.  In fact, it’s downright boring at times.  I think they should have chosen a better week in Tony Stark’s life to build a film around.  Pick one where he’s actually on top of his game.  That might have been more fun.

LS: As for me, I say less characters, and more character-development, would have saved this movie. IRON MAN 2 does neither. Well, folks, that’s it for now.

MA:  We’ll see you next week with a review of another movie. (To LS)  You can go back to sleep now.

LS:  Nah, I’m wide awake now. Just don’t make me sit through IRON MAN 2 again.

MA:  Hey, let’s take those Iron Man suits we got in our press kits out for a spin.

LS:  Do they actually fly?

MA:  Directions said they’re fully operational.

(MA & LS are now wearing IRON MAN suits.  They put their masks down, and their suits ignite.  They rocket upward and blast out through the roof into the night sky.  There is a great explosion, followed by the whistling sound of objects falling from the sky.  Various metal objects and body parts bounce to the ground.  The camera closes in on the heads of LS and MA, busily conversing even though their bodies are missing.)

LS:  Heads are going to roll for this!

MA:  You would have to put it that way.

FADE OUT

© Copyright 2010 by Michael Arruda and L.L. Soares

.

Michael Gives IRON MAN 2 – TWO KNIVES

.

LL GIVES IT – TWO KNIVES as well

SIN CITY

Posted in 2005, Cinema Knife Fights, Comic Book Movies, Crime Films with tags , , , , , on March 18, 2010 by knifefighter

CINEMA KNIFE FIGHT: SIN CITY (2005)
by Michael Arruda and L.L. Soares


In black and white, L.L. SOARES, wearing a trench coat, takes a seat at a bar next to MICHAEL ARRUDA. Cigarette smoke fills the air, and a stripper who looks a lot like Jessica Alba is performing on stage, twirling a lasso.

LS: Gimme a Chivas on the rocks.

Michael Arruda (in a tough guy voice): Give me a chocolate milk.

LS: What are you doing here?

MA: We’re reviewing SIN CITY, remember?

LS (smiles and looks up a stripper): Oh yeah. I thought you were here to celebrate a year of writing Cinema Knife Fight for Hellnotes.

(Their drinks arrive, in color)

MA: That, too. Cheers. (they clink glasses)

LS: Here’s blood in your eye! Okay. To begin with, SIN CITY is the creation and personal vision of comic book icon Frank Miller. Miller gained prominence in the 1980′s with his legendary work as writer and artist on such comic books as Marvel Comics’ DAREDEVIL and the groundbreaking Batman miniseries THE DARK KNIGHT RETURNS for DC Comics, which, along with Alan Moore’s WATCHMEN, pretty much set the standard for intelligent, adult takes on superheroes. After years of working on superhero comics, Miller created his own series for Dark Horse Comics called SIN CITY, which takes place in a world of his own creation, a violent take on 40′s noir featuring strange, often grotesque characters in tales of betrayal and vengeance. The various SIN CITY miniseries are some of Miller’s best work, and are unlike anything else in comics.

Director Robert Rodriguez had the foresight to bring Miller onboard as his co-director for the movie version of SIN CITY, and it shows. I have never before seen a movie that was as faithful to its source material. The look, the atmosphere, the dialogue is all right on the money. From the use of black and white with occasional bursts of color, to the stylized use of shadow and light, SIN CITY the movie looks a hell of a lot like SIN CITY the comic book, and this makes for a pretty unique movie-going experience. The movie incorporates storylines from three different comic book series, which have been intertwined. The first concerns police detective Hartigan (Bruce Willis), who saves 11-year old Nancy Callahan from the clutches of a child rapist/serial killer who just so happens to be the son of a prominent Senator. Hartigan is framed for the kidnapping and spends 8 years in prison, after which he gets out to find that he needs to protect the now grown up Nancy (Jessica Alba) yet again. The second storyline, and my personal favorite, concerns a thug named Marv who finds that the prostitute he spent the night with has been murdered, he’s been framed for the murder, and who then goes on a quest to find out who is behind it and exact some revenge. Marv is a virtually indestructible man, able to take tons of abuse and keep on going, and Mickey Rourke plays him with manic glee. The third storyline (partly directed by Quentin Tarantino) involves Dwight (Clive Owen), recently released from prison and out to give a little payback to the thug Jackie-Boy (an almost unrecognizable Benicio del Toro) who abused his girlfriend while he was away. When his pursuit of Jackie-Boy leads him to the prostitute-controlled Old Town, where the women enforce their own brand of justice, Dwight finds himself in the middle of a potential war between the mob, the girls of Old Town, and the police.

While not technically a horror movie, SIN CITY has plenty of horrific elements, from serial killers and cannibals to over the top violence. Like Tarantino’s KILL BILL movies, SIN CITY isn’t afraid to get its hands bloody.

MA: That’s for sure! First of all, I loved this movie, and I have to admit that for me it was a guilty pleasure. SIN CITY is far too violent for my tastes, yet I loved it, and I’d see it again, though I must say violence to this degree doesn’t impress me. Do we really need to see someone’s crotch ripped out? I know I don’t. I could write a list of everything I liked about SIN CITY, and not one scene of extreme violence would make the list.

LS: Y’know, sometimes I think you’d prefer reviewing Disney movies. I’m tired of hearing you whine about violence in the movies. I’m happy to say I enjoyed every bloody minute of this film.

MA: I enjoyed it too, but had this movie been made in the 1940s, when violence as depicted here wasn’t allowed, I guarantee you filmmakers like John Huston or Howard Hawks would have made a film just as compelling and exciting as this one. Extreme violence isn’t necessary. It’s fluff.

LS: You’re totally missing the point, as usual. Miller isn’t trying to recreate the films of the 40′s. In the comics and in this movie, he’s filtering the trappings of film noir through his own sensibility and has created a world all his own. And over-the-top violence is a part of that world. This isn’t meant to be a straightforward film noir. It’s an ultraviolent roller coaster ride. Sure Huston or Hawks could have made a movie as compelling, but it wouldn’t be SIN CITY.

MA: Says you. Anyway, let’s move on to the good stuff. The look of the film is breathtaking. The visual aspects of this movie are so impressive it plays like art. I was even more impressed by the script by Robert Rodriguez and Frank Miller. The dialogue is witty and intelligent. It is so much fun to go to a movie and be mentally challenged once in a while! And this from an action film!

The cast is terrific. I loved Bruce Willis and Mickey Rourke, who by far, as Marv, is the best part of the film. But I also enjoyed Rutger Hauer as the Cardinal, and Powers Boothe as the Senator. These men are fine actors, and so it’s no surprise how good their performances are here.

LS: Don’t forget the ladies.

MA (looking up at stripper): No, I’m not— I’m— I — aye yi yiiii!

LS: Put that tongue back in your mouth! Rosario Dawson was my personal favorite as Gail, but Jaime King does a good job as Goldie/Wendy, as does Devon Aoki as deadly assassin Miho, and Jessica Alba provides some nice eye candy as Nancy Callahan. There’s even Alexis Bledel (Rory from the TV show GILMORE GIRLS) as the prostitute Becky!

MA: The music by John Debney, Graeme Revell, and Robert Rodriguez is contagious. It hooks you in from the get go, and you don’t want it to stop. I thought the make-up in this film was phenomenal!

And you’re right that it’s technically not a horror movie, but it’s certainly dark fantasy, and it’s very, very dark. It’s a movie horror fans will enjoy.

Besides, director Robert Rodriguez is no stranger to horror. While he’s known for his work on the SPY KIDS films, he was also at the helm of two of the better horror movies from the 90s, the much appreciated FROM DUSK TILL DAWN (1996) and the underrated THE FACULTY (1998).

LS: I think SIN CITY blows away anything Rodriguez has done before. I actually think his work has been pretty uneven, but this film is practically flawless. Then again, I have to think Frank Miller’s work as co-director and co-writer helps. Together, the two of them have taken the world of Miller’s SIN CITY, from the bowels of Basin City to the alleys of Old Town, and brought it to adrenaline-soaked life.

Y’know I’m really surprised you liked this movie, considering how wimpy you are.

MA: Well, that just goes to show you how wimpy I’m not!

LS: Aww, shut your cake hole!

MA: Those are fighting words.

LS: You know it!

(LS pulls out a switchblade and slices MA across the chest. Great geysers of chocolate milk spray out, splattering them both.)

MA: Bartender, can I have another chocolate milk, please?

(Cut to the silhouette of a wolf approaching MA. Wolf licks chocolate milk from MA’s shirt.)

MA: Better make that two!

—END—

(First published in the Hellnotes newsletter on April 21, 2005)

© Copyright 2005 by Michael Arruda and L.L. Soares

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 88 other followers