Archive for Lost Films

THE MONSTROUS QUESTION! Answer 3 (of 3)

Posted in 2011, Lost Films, Zombie Movies with tags , , , , , on March 4, 2011 by knifefighter

THE MONSTROUS QUESTION!
(Questions by Michael Arruda)

QUESTION:
If you could discover lost footage from any movie, old or new, and this could include an entire movie, what would it be?

Sit back and enjoy this mock answer from the mind of Nick Cato.

*****

From NICK CATO:

DAWN OF THE DEAD: Screenplay Ending Rumored to Have Been Filmed!

"Here's looking at you, kid!" Ken Foree from the original DAWN OF THE DEAD

In the original script for George A. Romero’s DAWN OF THE DEAD (1979), Peter (played in the film by Ken Foree) does not escape.  He blows his brains out, and Fran flees to safety on her own with a pet dog (the dog was also left out of the final film version).  It was rumored for years that Romero had shot an alternate ending that upheld this suicide-vision from his original script.  And it does exist . . . if you look hard enough.

On the DAWN OF THE DEAD Ultimate edition 4-DVD boxed set (released in 2004 from Anchor Bay Entertainment), there’s an Easter egg (i.e. hidden extra) cleverly placed on the 3rd DVD, which is the European Cut of the film.  When Peter places the small pistol to his temple, the film pauses for a few seconds.

During this pause, click the pause on your DVD’s remote and a mini-menu screen will appear with the option to watch either “European Ending” or “Original Ending.”  Click “Original Ending,” and watch Peter’s brains splatter against the wall of their make-shift loft in all its never-before-seen 70s g(l)ory.

The film is 100 times darker now, with a pregnant Fran left to fend for herself as she descends to the skies in the chopper she had recently been trained to fly.

__________________________________

NOTE: Okay, before you run off and pause your DVD for an eternity searching for this original ending, this was a mock answer.  In short, it ain’t true! —Michael Arruda

—-END—-

THE MONSTROUS QUESTIONS! Answer 2 (of 3)

Posted in 2011, Lost Films with tags , , , , , , on March 3, 2011 by knifefighter

THE MONSTROUS QUESTION
(Questions by Michael Arruda)

QUESTION:

If you could discover lost footage from any movie, old or new, and this could include an entire movie, what would it be?

***

Answer 2: L.L. SOARES

When I was growing up, one of the biggest stories about “lost” footage concerned censored/lost scenes from the original KING KONG (1933). In places like the original FAMOUS MONSTERS OF FILMLAND magazine, these lost scenes were discussed and even had still photos to back them up. Since that time, a lot of these scenes have been restored on DVD. These include scenes like:

  • Kong putting a native in his mouth and chewing him up
  • Kong stepping on a native and crushing him with his foot
  • Kong playing with Fay Wray’s breasts with his finger

But while these scenes have been found, the most elusive one involves a giant spider. When Carl Denham and his men are chasing Kong in the jungle and end up on a log bridge, Kong shakes it, tossing many men down into the pit below to their death. At the bottom of this pit was a giant spider, waiting to eat them. How do we know this? Because there are photographs to prove it. However, the actual footage has still not been found, and it is unlikely it ever will.

The famous lost "Spider in the Pit" scene from the original KING KONG exists only as this photograph.

Peter Jackson paid homage to this lost scene in his remake of KING KONG, but it just wasn’t the same.

Of course, the holy grail of lost horror films remains LONDON AFTER MIDNIGHT (1927), starring silent movie icon, Lon Chaney, Sr.. Later remade in 1935 as MARK OF THE VAMPIRE by the same director who made the silent version, Tod Browning (also the director of the original DRACULA from 1931), we know it is the story of criminals who pretend to be vampires to scare people away from a house that may have a treasure inside. Chaney’s makeup for LONDON is legendary, due to more famous stills, but the actual film may be lost forever, as are many silent films that were not protected from deterioration. In fact, there are hundreds of old films that may be lost to us forever. LONDON AFTER MIDNIGHT is one of the most famous ones, though.

Despite the film being lost, this iconic image of Lon Chaney from LONDON AFTER MIDNIGHT lives on.

To try to rectify this loss, the cable channel TURNER CLASSIC MOVIES created a kind of movie picture book a few years back, by stringing together lots of still photographs that somehow survived from the movie. There were enough to actually string together a story. But, while this was a valiant attempt to recreate something lost to us forever, it just isn’t the same as the actual motion picture.

–THE END—

THE MONSTROUS QUESTION! Answer 1 (of 3)

Posted in 2011, Hammer Films, Horror, Lost Films, Universal Horror Films with tags , , , , , , , on March 2, 2011 by knifefighter

THE MONSTROUS QUESTION
(Questions by Michael Arruda)

Watching THE HILLS RUN RED a couple of weeks back, a horror movie about a lost horror film, it got me to thinking about the real thing.

There are lots of stories out there of lost scenes.  For example, growing up, I’d read about the scene cut from the Boris Karloff FRANKENSTEIN (1931) where the monster drowns the little girl.  This scene had been cut when the movie was shown on television, and although I’d seen stills from this scene, the actual scene didn’t seem to exist anymore, until it was discovered and restored on video in 1987.

There are so many more scenes like this out there that still have not turned up.

So, here’s this month’s MONSTROUS QUESTION:  If you could discover lost footage from any movie, old or new, and this could include an entire movie, what would it be?

*****

From MICHAEL ARRUDA:

I have read about many instances of lost scenes, but being a lifelong fan of Hammer Films, I’m going to go with a Hammer Film as my top choice, and it’s probably their most famous movie, HORROR OF DRACULA (1958).

The rumor has existed for years that Hammer released different versions of their movies for different markets.  For example, the tamest version was released in Britain, a more violent version went to the United States, and the most explicit version was shipped off to Japan.

For example, one of the bloodier scenes in HORROR OF DRACULA, where Van Helsing (Peter Cushing) drives a stake through Lucy’s (Carol Marsh) heart, was not shown in Britain until a recently restored version was made available in 2007, but the scene has been shown intact on U.S. video/DVD prints for longer than that.  The scene was often cut on U.S. television, though.  I would say that when I used to catch this movie on TV back in the 1970s, usually late at night, about 90% of the time this particular scene would be cut.  The uncut scene shows the stake going into Lucy’s chest, as blood bubbles out onto her gown.

Now, rumor has it that in the version released in Japan, Lucy actually tries to climb out of her coffin, but Van Helsing clobbers her across the head with the hammer.  I actually find this hard to believe, as it seems rather violent for 1958, even for Hammer, and I’ve never seen a still from this scene anywhere or read anywhere that it still exists.  But if it does, it’s one I definitely want to discover.

There are two other scenes in HORROR OF DRACULA still missing.  The first is of Jonathan Harker (John Van Eyssen) decomposing after he has been staked by Van Helsing.  In the print that exists now, the camera fades as Van Helsing approaches the crypt.   The staking scene doesn’t even happen on camera.  Stills of this scene do exist and show Harker in the crypt in an early stage of decomposition.

Now, the biggest missing scene from HORROR OF DRACULA is from its famous ending.  You know the scene, where Van Helsing runs across a table in castle Dracula and leaps through the air ripping down the curtains, unleashing the sunlight which ultimately destroys Dracula (Christopher Lee.)

There were scenes in the original HORROR OF DRACULA that have not been seen here.

This scene is pretty graphic as is, as we see Dracula disintegrate into dust before our very eyes, but it’s a quick scene, with each stage of decomposition interrupted by cutaways to reaction shots of Cushing’s Van Helsing.

But this scene was longer when originally filmed.  Evidently, for a particularly gruesome special effect, Lee’s face was painted over with a red blood-like make-up,  and then covered again with a flesh tone make-up, so when he scratched at his face, his fingers would rip through the “skin,” making deep bloody gouges in his face.

I’ve seen stills from this scene as well, and they’re pretty cool looking.   In the special feature on the DRACULA-PRINCE OF DARKNESS DVD from 2004, where Christopher Lee, Barbara Shelley, Francis Matthews, and Suzan Farmer provide voice-over commentary to DRACULA- PRINCE OF DARKNESS (1966) (this commentary was recorded in the late 1990s) Lee talks about the ending to HORROR OF DRACULA.

Since DRACULA-PRINCE OF DARKNESS is the sequel to HORROR OF DRACULA, the film begins with the ending of HORROR OF DRACULA before the opening credits, and during this sequence, in his voice-over commentary, Christopher Lee points out that the sequence he’s watching, where Dracula disintegrates, is much shorter than the one they originally filmed.  So, the longer death sequence was definitely shot.

If I had to pick one lost sequence to discover, this one would be it.

Some other lost sequences I would love to discover:

—from KING KONG (1933) the famous “spiders in the pit” scene after Kong has thrown the men off the giant log into the ravine below.

—-from THE WOLF MAN (1941) the scene where Larry Talbot (Lon Chaney Jr.) wrestles a bear, and any other scene that was filmed for its original shooting title, DESTINY.  Originally, the wolf man stuff was all going to be in Larry Talbot’s mind, and the bear wrestling scene I’m talking about supposedly had Talbot seeing himself as a werewolf fighting the bear, while onlookers saw only the man.  There are still several scenes in the final print where you can get a feel for the original intentions of the storytellers.

—from THE BRIDE OF FRANKENSTEIN (1935), the deleted footage where Karl (Dwight Frye) murders his uncle and then blames the crime on the Monster (Boris Karloff), a scene that explains why the Monster is so intent on killing Karl in the film’s climax.  Without this scene, the Monster’s actions make little sense.

I could go on, but it’s time to give someone else a turn.

—-END—

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 80 other followers