Archive for horror

GHOUL (2012)

Posted in 2013, Cable movies, Family Secrets, Grave Robbing, Horror, Monsters, Paul McMahon Columns, Supernatural, The Distracted Critic, TV-Movies with tags , , , , , , , on April 3, 2013 by knifefighter

GHOUL (2012)
Review by Paul McMahon, The Distracted Critic

G - poster

GHOUL is a movie I’d been following since I heard it was in production. Brian Keene’s novel remains my favorite work of his, and one of the more effective horror novels I’ve read. The reason Keene’s novel works is because the main horrors do not come from the creature haunting the graveyard, but from the parents who have the responsibility of raising their children in a safe and secure environment. This means, however, that a lot of the novel’s effectiveness comes from internal dialogues and the inner thoughts of the characters, both of which are very difficult to show on screen. As thrilled as I was that someone was finally filming a Brian Keene story, I thought that they couldn’t have picked a tougher story to adapt. Because of this, I went into the movie with high hopes but low expectations.

We start with Timmy (Nolan Gould, from the TV show MODERN FAMILY) digging his comics out from under his bed. As soon as he gets comfortable, his mom calls lights out. It demonstrates that kids are at the mercy of their parents’ rules and whims, setting the tone for the film. The next morning, Timmy watches cartoons while his Dad demands his attention. “The start of summer vacation doesn’t save you from your chores!” Timmy’s grandpa shushes him, pretending that he’s watching TV as well. Frustrated, Dad leaves the room. Grandpa (Barry Corbin, NO COUNTRY FOR OLD MEN, 2007) calls Timmy over and asks what he and his friends are planning to do with the underground clubhouse they’re building near the cemetery. Timmy is shocked because they thought nobody knew about it. Grandpa assures him nobody else does.

Later on, Timmy and Grandpa are working in the garden and Timmy’s friend Doug (Jacob Bila) bikes up out of breath, having been chased by a stray dog. Grandpa offers to finish Timmy’s chores and sends him on his way. Doug and Timmy go to Barry’s house, where Barry’s Dad (Dane Rhodes, DJANGO UNCHCAINED, 2012) bullies them, calling Doug a fag and telling him that’s probably why his Dad left. Timmy responds by accusing him of making Barry do his job while he sleeps off last night’s bottle. Barry’s dad forbids them to play near the cemetery again.

Dane Rhodes, as Mr. Smeltzer, terrorizes Timmy and Doug in Brian Keene's GHOUL.

Dane Rhodes, as Mr. Smeltzer, terrorizes Timmy and Doug in Brian Keene’s GHOUL.

Timmy and Doug meet up with Barry (Trevor Harker) and together they head to their clubhouse. They look at Doug’s hand-drawn map of the surrounding area. Suddenly, they hear Timmy’s Mom calling him. She’s frantic, distraught. “It’s your Grandpa, honey, I’m sorry.”

There are a lot of other things going on, and we get quick scenes depicting some of it. Three older kids on bikes, obviously up to no good, are searching the woods for the clubhouse. A pair of lovers making out in the woods are attacked and presumably killed.

After Grandpa’s funeral, Timmy and his friends are in the cemetery when Doug falls waist-deep into a sinkhole. Barry and Timmy pull him out. Barry says the sinkholes are all over the place because of the old mining operations. While Barry goes for the first aid kit, the stray dog appears, charging and barking. Barry grabs a shovel and attacks the dog viciously, cussing it out while he wails on it. The ferocity of his actions shocks Timmy and Doug. Later on, as they help Barry put away the tools, they discover another sinkhole in the caretaker’s shed, covered by a jagged piece of plywood. That night, over dinner, Timmy asks his dad about the stories of the ghoul. His dad tells him the ghoul is the equivalent of Bigfoot or the Loch Ness Monster.

Steve, one of the three bullies from earlier, spied Timmy and his friends in the shed. That night, Ronnie and Sammie join him and they break into the shed, planning to vandalize what they think is the kids’ clubhouse. They wonder how Timmy and his friends could have shoveled out the maze of tunnels they find, and then Ronnie and Steve continue on, leaving Sammie to stand watch. Predictably, Ronnie and Steve are attacked. Sammie runs back the way they came, arriving at the hole to see Barry’s Dad staring down at her. She pleads with him for help. “You shouldn’t play where you’re not invited,” he says, then pulls the plywood over the hole while she screams.

It’s difficult to distance yourself from a novel as good as GHOUL in order to take a movie adaptation on its own terms. Part of what makes the book so memorable is that it reaches beyond the usual coming-of-age story. These kids are dealing with some heavy-duty subject matter. Doug confesses that his mother comes to him at night and does things to him. Barry’s Dad regularly and brutally beats on him and his mom. From an acting standpoint, staying true to these emotional wallops would tax even the most practiced actors. The three kids in these roles do all they can, and in some scenes they fare pretty well, but in many others they seem disconnected from what’s going on. It felt like they saved their energy for the “big scenes,” which left many of the slower scenes flat.

Nolan Gould, Jacob Bila and Trevor Harker give their all while tasked with monumental acting challenges.

Nolan Gould, Jacob Bila and Trevor Harker give their all while tasked with monumental acting challenges.

The biggest problem I had with the movie is that it didn’t flow as a whole. It felt bumpy, as if I was watching something that had been heavily edited to fit time constraints. You learn to expect that from a made-for-TV movie, but with this one every time I started to get a handle on what was happening, the scene jumped away, plunging me into something else with no transition time.

Changes have been made to the story as well. Timmy’s parents are not what they were on the page. His mother is more prominent and caring, while his dad is in only two scenes and comes off as simply crabby and overworked. The most traumatic scene of the book has been cut entirely from the movie. If you read the book, you know what scene I’m talking about. There was also a major change to the ending, which I understand kept the focus on the humanity of the story, but it’s not a change any fan of the book will embrace.

GHOUL was a bold choice to put before the cameras, but, sadly, I can’t recommend the finished product. Fingers crossed that the upcoming DARK HOLLOW is a stronger film and more worthy of Keene’s name.

I give GHOUL 1 and one half stars, with 2 timeouts.

© Copyright 2013 by Paul McMahon

G - tv spot

Quick Cuts: Fun With the Oscars

Posted in 2013, Best Of Lists, Oscar-Worthy, Quick Cuts, Special Columns with tags , , , , , , , , on February 23, 2013 by knifefighter

QUICK CUTS:  Fun with the Oscars
With Michael Arruda & L.L. Soares

MICHAEL ARRUDA:  It’s Academy Awards time.  I thought we’d have some fun and do our own Cinema Knife Fight version of the Oscars, picking from familiar Academy Award categories, but staying within specific genres.

Here’s my take on the Best of 2012 Horror movies and the Best of 2012 Action movies:

CabinintheWoods.jpg

Best of HORROR movies 2012:

-Best Supporting Actress- Alice Eve, THE RAVEN

-Best Supporting Actor- Richard Jenkins, CABIN IN THE WOODS

-Best Actor- Ethan Hawke, SINISTER

-Best Actress –Kathryn Newton, PARANORMAL ACTIVITY 4

-Best Screenplay- Joss Whedon and Drew Goddard, CABIN IN THE WOODS

-Best Director- Timur Bekmambetov, ABRAHAM LINCOLN:  VAMPIRE HUNTER

-Best Picture – CABIN IN THE WOODS

 *****

TheAvengers.jpg

Best of ACTION movies 2012:

-Best Supporting Actress-Kate Beckinsale, CONTRABAND

-Best Supporting Actor- Leonardo DiCaprio, DJANGO UNCHAINED

-Best Actor – Tom Cruise, JACK REACHER

-Best Actress- Scarlett Johansson, THE AVENGERS

-Best Screenplay- Joss Whedon, THE AVENGERS

-Best Director- Quentin Tarantino, DJANGO UNCHAINED

-Best Picture- THE AVENGERS

*****

L.L. SOARES: And I’ve decided to do three list, for Horror, Action/Drama and Science Fiction.

Kill-list-poster

Best of HORROR movies 2012:

-Best Supporting Actress- Hannah Fierman, V/H/S (segment “Amateur Night”)

-Best Supporting Actor- Fran Kranz, CABIN IN THE WOODS

-Best Actor- Neil Maskell, KILL LIST/Ethan Hawke, SINISTER (tie)

-Best Actress –Sarah Bolger, THE MOTH DIARIES

-Best Screenplay- Amy Jump and Bean Wheatley, KILL LIST

-Best Director- Ben Wheatley, KILL LIST

-Best Picture –KILL LIST

 ****

Django-unchained-131112

Best of ACTION movies 2012:

Is  DJANGO UNCHAINED really an action movie? If so:

-Best Supporting Actress-Salma Hayek, SAVAGES

-Best Supporting Actor- Leonardo DiCaprio/Samuel L. Jackson (tie) DJANGO UNCHAINED

-Best Actor – Christoph Waltz/Jamie Foxx (tie) DJANGO UNCHAINED

-Best Actress- Anne Hathaway, THE DARK KNIGHT RISES

-Best Screenplay- Quentin Tarantino, DJANGO UNCHAINED

-Best Director- Quentin Tarantino, DJANGO UNCHAINED

-Best Picture- DJANGO UNCHAINED

-Best Fight Choreography – THE RAID

*****

John Carter

Best of SCIENCE FICTION movies of 2012:

-Best Supporting Actress- Emily Blunt, LOOPER/ Charlize Theron, PROMETHEUS (tie)

-Best Supporting Actor- Pierce Gagnon, LOOPER

-Best Actor – Taylor Kitsch, JOHN CARTER

-Best Actress-Noomi Rapace, PROMETHEUS

-Best Screenplay- Andrew Stanton, Mark Andrews and Michael Chabon, JOHN CARTER /Rian Johnson, LOOPER (tie)

-Best Director- Andrew Stanton, JOHN CARTER

-Best Picture- JOHN CARTER

*****

ARRUDA:    Have fun this weekend watching the real thing!  Thanks for joining us!

—END—

HORROR-MOM TAKES A SNOW DAY!

Posted in 1990s Horror, 2013, Ancient Civilizations, Family Secrets, Horror-Mom's Guide to Scary Movies, Sheri White Reviews, Stephen King Movies, TV-Movies with tags , , , , on January 20, 2013 by knifefighter

HORROR-MOM’S GUIDE TO SCARY MOVIES
Horror-Mom Takes a Snow Day!
By Sheri White

Another snowy day, another school day canceled. You’ve seen enough of Spongebob and iCarly, and you’re tired of the yelling and the cries of “I’m bored!” And that’s just you! Imagine how the kids feel by now. Christmas is over, the toys are broken and it’s too cold to go out.  YOU’RE ALL TRAPPED.

What do you do? Movie marathon, of course! And I have the perfect movie to watch together in a huddle under some blankets while the snow piles up outside – STEPHEN KING’S STORM OF THE CENTURY. This is an original TV mini-series penned by Stephen King, shown over several nights in 1999. It’s dark, claustrophobic, and very creepy.

StormofCentury_Cover

Little Tall Island, a little village off the coast of Maine, is getting ready for a blizzard to hit, the worst they’ve seen in decades. Most of the citizens have evacuated, with just a handful staying behind to ride it out. But when Mike Anderson, the town constable, is called to a brutal murder, the townspeople begin to realize they are threatened by more than a storm.

Mike takes the murderer, Andre Linoge, into custody; he doesn’t put up any resistance but lets Mike know that he’ll go away if he’s given what he wants. Dismissing this ominous intonation at first, the townspeople go about getting ready for the storm. As mysterious things begin happening around them, they finally realize that Linoge is more than just a murderer—he’s something dark and evil, and they are all in danger.

Terrified, they eventually agree to give Linoge what they want—but the price they have to pay will be immeasurable.

STORM OF THE CENTURY is not for young children. But if your kids are middle-school-aged and older, you will enjoy a cozy afternoon of terror while snow rages outside your own window.

© Copyright 2013 by Sheri White

Horror-Mom’s Guide to Scary Movies Presents: THE GREEN MARKER SCARE (2012)

Posted in 2012, Animated Films, Horror, Horror-Mom's Guide to Scary Movies, Mystery, Sheri White Reviews, Teen Detectives, Twist Endings with tags , , , , , on December 5, 2012 by knifefighter

HORROR-MOM’S GUIDE TO SCARY MOVIES PRESENTS:
THE GREEN MARKER SCARE (2012)
Film Review by Sheri White

 

When Graham Jones asked me to review his new online movie, he told me it was animated by children. So I thought it would be perfect for this column. Graham did tell me that although it was animated by kids, it was definitely not a movie for kids.

I was skeptical, because when I hear that, and then watch the movie, it’s usually pretty tame. And I thought that about THE GREEN MARKER SCARE for the first 45 minutes or so. Sure, it was a little creepy here and there, but nothing most kids couldn’t handle.

Noreen is a young girl whose father is killed in a car accident. His last words inspire her to investigate the crash, since it doesn’t really seem accidental. Her findings lead her to realize there is something evil going on in her small town, and her father knew all about it.

The entire movie is drawn in green marker. There isn’t a lot of movement in the characters, which is a little creepy in itself—most of the time, only the eyes move.

There is no sex at all in the movie, and no overt violence. The only violence is off-camera, but it’s still shocking.

So is this movie appropriate for children? That’s actually a difficult question to answer in regards to this movie, unlike if I were reviewing (something obvious like) THE EXORCIST (1973). The subject matter in THE GREEN MARKER SCARE is definitely not for little kids, but then again, little kids won’t really get what’s going on. This is not in-your-face horror, and most young children will be bored since a lot of the movie is dialogue.

Older kids probably won’t be phased by the subject matter, unless they scare easily or are brought up in a very religious household.

I think this is more of a movie for adults, not just because of its subject matter, but because it is so quiet and dialogue-driven. Most kids who watch horror movies like the loudness, the gore and splatter. But adults, and especially parents, will appreciate how the movie comes together to horrify the watcher.

This is an Irish movie and the characters have Irish brogues—it was a little difficult to understand some of the dialogue at times, but the movie was so well put together, that I was still able to follow the story.

Variety magazine calls Graham Jones  “a very talented director,” and after watching THE GREEN MARKER SCARE, I would have to agree.

I give it four knives.

To view the movie for yourself, go HERE.

NOTE: Although children drew this movie, they were unaware of the subject matter.

© Copyright 2012 by Sheri White

Sheri White  gives THE GREEN MARKER SCARE ~four (out of five) knives!

THE BAY (2012)

Posted in 2012, Conspiracy Theories, Disease!, Faux Documentaries, Found Footage Movies, Gore!, Horror, LL Soares Reviews, Parasites! with tags , , , , , , on November 15, 2012 by knifefighter

THE BAY (2012)
Movie Review by L.L. Soares

This one sounded interesting to me. A “found footage” horror movie by Barry Levinson, the director who gave us such memorable films through the years as DINER (1982), THE NATURAL (1984), RAIN MAN (1988), BUGSY (1991), SLEEPERS (1996) , WAG THE DOG (1997) and lots more. That’s one hell of a resume.

And I’ve actually enjoyed most of the “found footage” movies that have been coming out lately, even though the genre gets a bad rap. I was definitely interested in seeing what Levinson would do with the concept.

THE BAY (2012) got a limited release in a few cities across the country, and is also currently on cable OnDemand. Watching this movie, I found myself wondering why it didn’t get a wider release.

The “bay” in question here is Chesapeake Bay, which I read is “the largest estuary in the United States” surrounded by Maryland and Virginia. The movie THE BAY takes place mostly in a small town called Claridge, Maryland. It relies mostly on tourism for its income. But there are also lots of chicken farms in the area, made possible thanks to a big desalination plant that makes enough water available to support the industry. But there’s the problem of animal waste and rumors that there might have been a nuclear waste leak years back, or so the movie tells us. And that chicken waste has a lot of chemicals in it like steroids and other stuff to increase the birds’ growth and meat production.

It’s the Fourth of July, and there’s a big celebration in Claridge, including a crab-eating contest and sailing and fireworks. But this year, something goes wrong. People start getting sick. They starts to erupt with boils and throw up blood, and develop wounds that look as if their flesh is being eaten away from the inside. People start to panic, and bodies start piling up in the streets.

What is causing this pandemic? We have clues as to the conditions that bred such a disease, but the actual culprit might surprise you.

Meanwhile, the movie is made up of footage that was being suppressed. A chunk of it is from the point of view of Donna Thompson (Kether Donohue), a young news reporter who got her “big break” that Fourth of July, when she thought she was just covering another small town holiday, but instead stumbled on something horrible. She just wants to get this footage out to the world before it happens again.

Not all of the footage is of Donna and what she witnesses, however. There’s also video of two researchers who were testing the bay’s toxicity;  a family (wife, husband and baby) who film themselves taking their boat to Claridge to meet the wife’s parents; and footage of Dr. Jack Abrams (Stephen Kunken), who first sees an emergency room waiting area with about 30 people who are infected with strange symptoms. Then he sees that number rise to 60 people, and more and more. His frantic Skypes to the Center for Disease Control don’t seem to be taken seriously at first, and by the time the authorities start to worry, it’s clear they want to cover this up and avoid a mass panic. We also see a few Claridge police officers making their rounds in COPS-like footage, and we see a girl on Facebook making videos, unable to get help, and afraid she might die alone. As the movie progresses, the symptoms of the people infected get more gory and disturbing.

Somehow, all this various footage meshes well together, and tells a compelling story about a horrible flesh-eating disease, and puts a human face on that disease.

Levinson does a fine job with the material. No matter how much I want to get sick of the found footage genre, movies like this pop up that keep it viable. I was pretty riveted throughout, wondering what was behind all this, and if it could be stopped in time. Levinson does a great job here building suspense. And the performances help him to sell the story. The acting here is all very good and the people are believable.

Keather Donohue plays reporter Donna Thompson, who is trying to get word out about what seems to be a killer disease in THE BAY.

There has been some hype about the fact that Oren Peli is one of the producers. He’s the guy who gave us the PARANORMAL ACTIVITY franchise and the short-lived ABC series THE RIVER. And sure, Peli is the king of this kind of stuff. But THE BAY stands or falls on the work of a director named Barry Levinson, and while it might seem that he’s working with material that is beneath him, he pulls it off really well.

I enjoyed this movie, and it kept me glued to the screen throughout. I give it three knives.

© Copyright 2012 by L.L. Soares

LL Soares gives THE BAY ~three  knives.

Screams Cut Short: PRANK (2012)

Posted in 2012, Gregory G. Kurczynski Columns, Practical Jokes Gone Wrong, Revenge!, Screams Cut Short, Short Films with tags , , , , , on November 7, 2012 by knifefighter

SCREAMS CUT SHORT Presents:
PRANK (2012)
Written and Directed by Robert Mearns
Review by Gregory G. Kurczynski

It is often said that every story may not have been written, but every story has already been told. This is especially true of horror, with so many of the basic themes and archetypes being revisited by writers and filmmakers almost daily. The responsibility then becomes not to create something necessarily original, but to shift perspective and examine the themes to tell the same story in a way that gives it an individual voice.

It is with these thoughts in mind we take a look at PRANK, a seven minute tale of bad judgment and its resulting consequences, which either works or fails depending on the context in which it is viewed. But I’ll expand on that later.

The movie opens on a scene reminiscent of any installment of the SAW or HOSTEL franchises. In an isolated section of some industrial facility, Jimmy (Ben Elliott) lies stripped, bound and gagged on the grimy metal floor. He screams and struggles as a winch begins to pull him upward by his feet, suspending him upside down, as we are treated to scenes of a barely glimpsed figure in an adjoining room preparing to do very bad things to Jimmy. We’re not sure what, but it’s clear that they involve an industrial paint sprayer.

From this, we cut to a scene of Beth (Kara Miller) waking with a start as if from a nightmare, but it’s only the phone ringing. It’s a friend of Beth’s calling to tell her that she had a visit from the police. Apparently Jimmy has disappeared, and the cops were asking about Brandon.

What happened to Brandon? Cut to a flashback of a deserted, moonlit beach where Jimmy is burying an unconscious Brandon (Mike Armstrong Jr.) up to his neck in the sand ala Ted Danson in CREEPSHOW (1982). Beth, who is clearly Jimmy’s girlfriend, protests, but Jimmy will not be deterred. It’s all harmless fun, a prank at Brandon’s expense that will result in a simply hilarious YouTube video. Well, it’s all fun until Jimmy and Beth fall asleep on the beach after making out and the tide starts to roll in…

So, what we have here are all the elements of a classic “revenge and consequences for bullying and stupid, drunken behavior” tale established in such films as TERROR TRAIN (1980), I KNOW WHAT YOU DID LAST SUMMER (1997) and VALENTINE (2001), with a bit of torture porn influence thrown in to spice it up. This is not a criticism. As stated earlier, every story has been told before, but does writer and director Robert Mearns do anything to make his take on the material stand out? Again, it depends on the context in which you view it.

PRANK is a short film that was made based on a feature script that Mearns’ currently has in development. If viewed as an extended trailer to generate interest in the larger project, it works very well. The cinematography by DP Paolo Cascio, especially in the kill room scenes, is extremely accomplished and striking, the editing and sound design are very effective in creating a sense of tension, and the viewer gets just enough of the story to whet the appetite and leave them wanting more. Based on this, I can understand why the movie received a nomination for Best Short Under Ten Minutes at Shriekfest 2012. As the credits rolled, I found myself wanting to see where Mearns is going with this.

And this wanting is precisely why PRANK does not hold up as a stand-alone short. We are given the foundation of a story, but no story arc. We see that Jimmy is a bullying douchebag who does stupid things and Beth is his girlfriend with a heart of gold who knows what they are doing is wrong but is too passive and enamoured of her boyfriend to do anything, but we get no character development. And at the climax, we don’t even get a payoff. The movie does not end so much as just stops.

So the final judgment on PRANK is that Mearns and company show a lot of potential. I look forward to seeing the feature in order to see how he brings his own, fresh voice to an old story.

You can check out the trailer here.

© Copyright 2012 by Gregory G. Kurczynski

Screams Cut Short: THE SLEEPOVER (2012)

Posted in 2012, Gregory G. Kurczynski Columns, Screams Cut Short, Short Films, Slasher Movies with tags , , , , , on October 24, 2012 by knifefighter

SCREAMS CUT SHORT:
THE SLEEPOVER (2012)
By Gregory G. Kurczynski

I love this time of year. The oppressive heat, humidity and hurricanes of summer give way to the crispness of fall and we begin to turn our attention to the greatest holiday on the calendar, Halloween. More importantly, the weeks leading up to October 31st bring us into the thick of the horror film festival scene and a bumper crop of new independent films to discover. With this in mind, it is only fitting that SCREAMS CUT SHORT takes some time for the next few columns to focus on some of these new efforts, starting with director Chris Cullari’s homage to the slasher genre, THE SLEEPOVER (2012).

The story begins innocently enough with two boys, Tom (Josh Feldman) and his new friend Eric (Gus Kamp), being checked on for a final goodnight by their babysitter, Rachel (Carolyn Jania), as they prepare for bed. Tom actually goes to bed, much to the chagrin of Eric whose idea of a sleepover involves less sleep and more firecrackers and surfing the web for pictures of naked girls. Eric continues to instigate, but Tom will have none of it, simply saying that it’s “not safe.”

Being the new kid in town, Eric is not aware that the town of Derry has been plagued for years by a masked serial killer known as “The Slasher.” This personification of evil can appear at any time and without warning, leading the good people of Derry to take such precautions as checking the closets and under the bed before lights out and requiring babysitters to be licensed and trained in hand-to-hand combat. Of course Eric isn’t buying a word of it, arguing angrily that “The Slasher” is nothing more than an invention of parents devised to scare kids into behaving and going to bed on time.

Who’s right? Is “The Slasher” real? If you’ve seen any number of horror films produced from 1977 onward, those questions aren’t hard to answer. But in its approximately six minute run time, THE SLEEPOVER certainly has a lot of fun doing so.

Tom (Josh Feldman) and Eric (Gus Kamp) get ready for bed in THE SLEEPOVER.

One thing that is clear after seeing this movie is that Cullari has an intimate understanding and knowledge of the slasher film, and he’s not afraid to use every cliché in his arsenal to throw at the audience. From ominous music cues climaxing in shocking stingers to camera setups designed to foreshadow what may or may not be lurking in the shadows, it’s all here. But Cullari turns these elements on their head in such a way that the final product seems fresh. He invites the audience to join him in poking respectful fun of the genre, but it’s never mean-spirited or self-referential. For fans of the genre, this movie is a reminder of why some of the greatest masked killer movies are so much fun.

But the most impressive element of THE SLEEPOVER is in the performances of Feldman and Kamp, the two young leads. These boys play against each other in a completely relaxed and funny manner that makes the viewer really believe the friendship. I’m sure that this is due in no small part from the dialogue written by Cullari and co-writer Jennifer Raite, but the actors make it real.

THE SLEEPOVER took the award for best super short film at this year’s Shriekfest Horror Film Festival,as well as being named Runner Up in the “Short Fuse” category at Fantastic Fest. These awards were richly deserved, and as it continues to make the festival rounds, I would highly recommend catching this one.

For additional information and news on upcoming screenings, you can visit the movie’s Facebook page here. Also, check out the trailer here.

-END-

© Copyright 2012 by Gregory G. Kurczynski

This week’s spotlight is on:
THE SLEEPOVER (2012)
Directed by Chris Cullari
Written by Chris Cullari and Jennifer Raite

Meals for Monsters: SANTA SANGRE (1989)

Posted in 2012, Classic Films, Highly Stylized Films, Jenny Orosel Columns, Just Plain Weird, Madness, Meals for Monsters, Religious Cults, Surrealism with tags , , , , , on February 1, 2012 by knifefighter

MEALS FOR MONSTERS: SANTA SANGRE (1989)
By Jenny Orosel

 

I have to preface this by saying just how much I love Alejandro Jodorowsky.  The man is insane.  Beautifully, wonderfully insane, and it’s reflected in his movies.  Watching one of his movies is like going to a four star restaurant in a foreign country—you may not understand all of what you’re consuming, but my God, it might be one of the best things you’ve ever consumed.  That’s how I feel about his movies.  And it thrills me to come up with a delicious meal for SANTA SANGRE (1989).

SANTA SANGRE was the last movie Jodorowsky directed (well, there was one work-for-hire the year after, but he refuses to acknowledge it, so I shall not) before moving into the realm of comics.  Our hero, the young Fenix, grew up in a circus but has been in a mental institution since, years earlier as a child, he saw his father cut off his mother’s arms before killing himself.  He stayed there in willing silence until his armless mother helps him escape.  They make a good living doing a mime act, but Mom’s got a grudge and, since she doesn’t have the hands to do it herself, forces the sad Fenix to murder beautiful women for her.  It sounds like a simple slasher flick.  However, this is nothing like any splatterpunk you’ve seen before.  There’s enough blatant symbolism to make Freud weep.  Temptation is a running theme (the family mime act is about the Garden of Eden), poor Fenix has strange hallucinations of white doves and giant snakes growing from his crotch.  And the ever-present holiness of blood.

It makes sense that, for a cocktail, to mix up a few Santa Sangrias:

SANTA SANGRIA

 

Ingredients:
Chopped fruit
Seltzer water
Cheap red wine.

Directions:

Drop a handful of the chopped fruit into the glass.  Fill half with red wine and half with seltzer water.  Enjoy.

The opening scene of Fenix in the institution shows them trying to get him to eat a meal like a normal person.  When that fails, they offer him a whole fish, which he devours.  While I’m not going to have you serve up anything with a face or eyes, I think fish would be an appropriate main course:

BLOOD ORANGE BAKED COD (serves four)

Ingredients:
4 pieces cod
2 blood oranges
1 stick butter
Salt, pepper & dried parsley to taste

Directions:

Preheat the oven to 350 degrees.  Melt the butter.  Juice one of the blood oranges and mix with the butter.  Dip each piece of cod in the mixture, coating it, and place in baking pan.  Drizzle some of the excess onto the fish.  Salt, pepper and parsley to taste.  Slice remaining blood orange and place one slice on each piece of fish.  Bake for 30 minutes.  Serve with rice, potatoes or toast.

With all the temptation symbolism, it should come as no surprise that apples are in a number of scenes.  Why not, for dessert, have some apple dumplings?

GARDEN OF EDEN APPLE DUMPLINGS: (serves four)

 

Ingredients:
4 apples
2 sheets puff pastry, thawed if frozen
¼ cup brown sugar
2 tbs cinnamon
1 beaten egg with a splash of water

Directions:

Preheat the oven to 425 degrees.  Peel and core the apples.  Cut each sheet of puff pastry in half.  Mix the brown sugar and cinnamon.  Place the apple in the center of the pastry, fill the core hole with the sugar/cinnamon mix, and sprinkle a little extra on top.  Bring the corners up, pinch them closed and seal up the sides.  Place on greased baking sheet.  Brush the egg over the dumpling and bake at 425 for ten minutes.  Lower the temperature to 375 and bake an additional 20 minutes.  Serve warm.

If you’ve heard of Alejandro Jodorowsky but never seen any of his movies, this is a great one to start with.  It has all his signature style and weirdness, but the plot is the most linear of any of his movies (minus that one film-that-shall-not-be-named).  If you’re willing to sit through a little weirdness, you won’t be disappointed.  Or, at least, you’ll have a yummy meal to get you through the night.

© Copyright 2012 by Jenny Orosel

THE SKIN I LIVE IN (2011)

Posted in 2011, Art Movies, Foreign Films, Horror, LL Soares Reviews, Surgical Horror with tags , , , , , on November 14, 2011 by knifefighter

THE SKIN I LIVE IN (2011)
Movie Review by L.L. Soares

I’ve been a fan of Pedro Almodovar for a long time now. I think the first movie of his I ever saw was 1987’s LAW OF DESIRE. By then, he was already an arthouse sensation, having previously made such talked-about films as DARK HABITS (1983) and MATADOR (1986). And then something happened in 1988, with his film WOMEN ON THE VERGE OF A NERVOUS BREAKDOWN. He broke through to another level completely, and began his ascent to the role of iconic director. WOMEN was his first big international hit, and it wouldn’t be his last. Suddenly, the guy who was making quirky films about society’s outcasts was a genre unto himself, eventually winning the Foreign Film Oscar for 1999’s ALL ABOUT MY MOTHER (which, strangely, I didn’t like very much).

Despite often dark subject matter and forays into violence and brutality, I always saw Almodovar as an upbeat director. His first priority is always his characters, and he makes you care about them, and the plot is merely the journey their lives take. You don’t necessarily think of him as someone who makes horror films, and yet his most recent film, THE SKIN I LIVE IN, has been called just that. Having finally seen the film, I can’t whole-heartedly agree, because Almodovar is still a genre unto himself, still unlike anyone else making films today. And yet there are distinctively horrific elements in his new film.

SKIN serves up the tale of Dr. Robert Ledgard (Antonio Banderas), a famous plastic surgeon. Some of you may remember that back in 1990, Banderas became star thanks to Almodovar’s TIE ME UP! TIE ME DOWN! He’d been in several of Almodovar’s films before that, but TIE ME UP! was the film that brought him to the world’s attention in a big way, and soon afterwards, Banderas moved to America and started what has been a long career in American films (NOTE: the same week THE SKIN I LIVE IN was released in the arthouse theaters, the movie PUSS N’ BOOTS, where he gave voice to the title animated character, was the Number 1 movie at the Box Office). But he started in Spain with Almodovar, and it’s nice to see the two reunited after all these years.

Dr. Ledgard is keeping a woman captive in his home, named Vera Cruz (Elena Anaya) , and she is desperate to escape when we find her. She has been locked in a room for what seems like years (and which reminded me in a strange way of Chan-Wook Park’s OLDBOY from 2003, for this reason). Vera watches television (mostly yoga tapes, something she practices for hours), and makes strange papier mache art objects, many of which are busts of people covered in bandages, much like her own appearance during recovery after several operations. At the same time, Vera is constantly under surveillance, with several TV screens throughout the house showing her every move.

Dr. Ledgard has discovered a new kind of synthetic flesh which not only replaces damaged tissue (it’s intended specifically for burn victims), but which is an improvement on real flesh, since it is more impervious to damage, and repels such things as insect bites. And it is clear that Vera has been his guinea pig in this discovery.

When Dr. Ledgard is away, the household is run by Marilia (Marisa Peredes), a harsh-looking woman who is not only the head of the domestic staff; we also learn she is Ledgard’s real mother. When Marilia’s son (and thus Ledgard’s half-brother), Zeca (Roberto Alamo) shows up – a bank robber looking for sanctuary – things suddenly get out of hand, as the violent Zeca sees Vera on the surveillance screens and decides to go looking for her. When he finds the right room and breaks in, Vera thinks her savior has finally arrived to set her free, but Zeca is only interested in raping her. But Dr. Ledgard arrives home in time to interrupt.

The rest of the film jumps back and forth in time to show us what happened in Ledgard’s life to bring him to this point, how Vera got to be in this situation, and more. This being an Amoldovar film, as I mentioned earlier, characters and their histories are the most important aspects here, and SKIN becomes a kind of melodrama, or cinematic soap opera, as things progress. But I am not saying that to belittle the film. On the contrary, Almodovar uses these trappings to great effect to tell his stories, much in the way that great directors of the past like Douglas Sirk brought us unique human dramas that were completely their own.

In the flashbacks, we meet everyone from Ledgard’s former wife, who killed herself, to his daughter, a girl suffering from severe social anxiety who is raped after a party, and other interesting characters. Each of them plays a significant part in the story, and by the end, everything has taken some fascinating turns, many of which we don’t see coming.

As for Banderas, I found his performance cold at first. With his slicked-back hair and icy demeanor, he’s hard to sympathize with, and I was concerned he would come off as one-dimensional. But, as the story unfolds and we learn a great deal about his past, he becomes warmer and fully human. The same goes for the other key players here, with Vera perhaps the most tragic of all.

Once the mysteries of the film opened up, like the petals of a flower, I found myself going from liking THE SKIN I LIVE IN, to deciding it is a work of brilliance in many ways. While I’ve been a fan of Almodovar throughout his career, I’ve found his more recent films to be a bit uneven, but this one had the best elements of Almodovar’s work, giving us a true return to form for a man considered a master filmmaker.

There have been many horror films dealing with merciless plastic surgeons over the years, from 1935s THE RAVEN, where surgeon Bela Lugosi mutilated the face of gangster Boris Karloff, only agreeing to fix it if Karloff did his bidding; to the classic 1960 French film EYES WITHOUT A FACE (LES YEUX SANS VISAGE) by Georges Franju, which used truly poetic imagery to tell the tale of a man using surgery to try to replace the face of daughter, injured in a car crash, with the flesh of abducted women. Almodovar uses this theme to his own ends, but he does it in a powerful, dramatic way that will take your breath away at certain points.

Easily one of the best films I’ve seen this year. I give THE SKIN I LIVE IN, four out of five knives.

© Copyright 2011 by L. L. Soares

L.L. Soares gives THE SKIN I LIVE IN ~ four out of five knives!

APOLLO 18

Posted in 2011, Cinema Knife Fights, Faux Documentaries, Outer Space, Science Fiction with tags , , , , , , on September 5, 2011 by knifefighter

CINEMA KNIFE FIGHT: APOLLO 18
By Michael Arruda and L.L. Soares

(THE SCENE: The crater-strewn surface of the moon. MICHAEL ARRUDA and LL SOARES are dressed in space suits, waving to the audience. We hear their voices over radio transmitters)

MA: We sure are having fun here on the moon.

LS: Why are you lying to the people? I hate it here.

MA: Because, we’re supposed to be upbeat and cheerful. That’s what NASA told us to say. They only want good PR.

LS: Oh my God, something’s inside my suit. AAAARGH! (Lurches over screaming)

MA: What’s wrong? What’s wrong!! Are you okay?

LS: Haha. I was just screwin’ with you. There’s nothing in my suit.

MA: Well, I’m not screwin with you. There IS something in your suit. Look!

(A creature resembling a squid/spider hybrid scurries across LS’s face inside his space helmet. LS opens his eyes wide. Then he opens his mouth and eats it.)

LS: That’s just my snack. Packed it this morning. (LS sucks in a dangling tentacle and licks his lips.) Tasty. Just like raw oysters, but with lots of legs. Want to try one?

MA: No. I’ll pass.

LS: You don’t know what you’re missing!

MA: I have a pretty good idea. Hey, how about we start our review of APOLLO 18?

LS: Might as well. I sure am bored up here on the moon. (Looks over the expanse of the moon’s surface). It sure is desolate up here. I hope we can go home soon.

MA: After the review.

LS: Okay. Well, I wasn’t sure what to expect from APOLLO 18. It had been scheduled for five different release dates over the last year and kept getting pushed back. This kind of thing is usually a bad sign—the studio is hesitant to actually release the film. But I didn’t think it was half bad. At least it finally—thankfully—came out. I was just getting sick of seeing the trailer forever.

MA: At least it was a good trailer.  It was one of the main reasons I was looking forward to this movie.  It was an effective teaser that caught my interest.

LS:  Yeah, but after a gazillion weeks, it gets sickening.

As anyone who has seen the trailer for this one can tell you, APOLLO 18 is the latest movie to use the old BLAIR WITCH PROJECT (1999) fake documentary style. It’s funny how that little movie has had such a big influence on horror cinema. And no matter how many times I complain about this, I’d say the majority of films we have seen using this style have been pretty good. It’s a cheap, easy way to make a scary movie. It doesn’t even have to have good production values. Someday a race of aliens is going to discover our culture and wonder what was wrong with us – the more advanced we get, the worse quality some of our movies look.

MA: I agree. This style works really well. It’s an effective way to induce scares, mostly because it creates a sense of panic—oh my God it’s happening right now! —and it makes the story seem real. Plus, you know that when bad things start happening, you don’t have the luxury of being able to escape to another character’s perspective.  No switching to the character’s wife worrying in her home or to the detective who’s putting the clues together to save the day. You know you’re stuck with the guy holding the camera, and when things happen to him, there’s no getting away from it. It really does add to the intensity of the thrills.

LS: Anyway, this one is a bit more clever in the cinematography department, because it actually tries to replicate the look of old, lost NASA footage from Kennedy era. This means some of it can look bad, but a lot of it has to look dated and believable. And it works here. Like the footage of the astronauts being interviewed before the launch. It looks like faded film stock from the 60s. I thought some of this stuff was very cool.

MA: Yep, the cinematography here was very good. But I didn’t find these scenes all that interesting, other than from the technical standpoint you just mentioned. The three astronauts we’re introduced to are rather dull fellows.

LS: So the plot revolves around the idea that there was a manned mission to the moon in the early 1970s that we’ve never heard about, because something went wrong and NASA covered it up. I don’t know how good this idea is. I mean, it fuels the rest of the movie, but back then a moon launch involved a giant rocket blasting off into space with lots of flames and smoke and I think that kind of thing would be hard to hide. Wouldn’t someone in the media see that they were launching a rocket? It’s not a little thing that can be done secretly.

MA: Pay no attention to that giant fireball in the sky! It’s just a weather balloon. Yeah, a weather balloon, that’s it! Yeah, I’m not sure I buy into the secret launch thing either, and I never quite understood fully what their mission was in the first place. It has to do with spying on the Russians, but it’s unclear—anyway, I may be getting ahead of you. Please, continue.

LS: Gee, thanks. Mighty kind of you. Here have a snack.

(LS tosses a squid/spider creature at MA that hits him in the helmet. It sticks there for a moment before MA raises a can of Raid and sprays the creature which shrivels and falls to the ground.

LS (shaking his head): Stop wasting food! There are starving alien children on Andromeda who are going hungry!

MA: I’ll write a check in the morning.

LS: Oh well, so they do this secret launch and one guy stays in a segment orbiting the moon while two other astronauts, Ben (Warren Christie) and Nate (Lloyd Owen) take the lunar module down to the moon’s surface. Just like other missions, there’s lots of slow motion walking around, planting an American flag in the moon’s crust, and the collection of moon rocks.

MA: Not particularly compelling stuff, but the good news is we get it out of the way rather quickly, and it doesn’t take too long for the good stuff to start happening.

LS: They’re not really sure why they’re on this particular mission, since it doesn’t seem different from previous ones. But then, things start going wrong.

It begins when they find a Russian module abandoned on the other side of a crater. First off, the Russians weren’t supposed to have made it to the moon, and the astronauts are surprised NASA didn’t tell them about this beforehand. Then they find the body of a cosmonaut in one of the craters. His helmet is cracked and removed, and the face of his corpse looks horrified.

MA: That’s a great scene!

LS: Then again, you’d be horrified too if you suddenly realized there was no air to breathe! It doesn’t look like an accident though – the helmet looks forcibly damaged, and the guys wonder what’s going on here. There’s no sign of a second cosmonaut (is there one?) and their craft looks like someone trashed it, pulling out wires and smashing stuff – although the computers still work and it appears to have plenty of oxygen and fuel to get home.

So what happened?

Not long after this, Nate is outside the module alone, and starts screaming that something is in his suit. We see a glimpse of something moving around inside his helmet, and he collapses. Ben brings him inside and provides first aid. Nate has a big gash in his side and as the wound slowly gets infected, Nate begins to deteriorate, getting sicker and sicker and acting kinda crazy. Ben has no idea what to do. He also has no idea what’s going on, and has no clue if he is in danger as well.

Things just get more and more tense after this.

APOLLO 18, directed by Gonzalo Lopez-Gallego, does a good job of ratcheting up the suspense. The movie starts off slow once they get to the moon and the mission goes as planned, but once things start to go wrong, the movie is very suspenseful as you sit on the edge of your seat, wondering what will happen next.

MA: I agree. Lopez-Gallego does a nice job here. The film really does make you feel ill at ease and uncomfortable.

LS: The acting is good, the way it’s filmed actually adds to the whole experience because just when you might discover an answer, the camera will shut down, or you’ll just get a glimpse of something quickly and not be sure what you saw. A big plus is the location as well. They’re on the moon, so they have to move around in bulky slow-moving suits. But when they’re actually out of the suits and free to move around, they are in a very confined space. The claustrophobic aspect of the film really adds to the tension.

I liked APOLLO 18 until we started to get real answers. Once we find out what the threat is, I thought it was ludicrous. It just made no sense at all (Especially since previous moon missions had been uneventful—why would that suddenly change?). Any good things about the movie almost evaporated when we discover what the secret is. I think that is the weakest part of the otherwise good script by Brian Miller.

MA: I didn’t like the secret either, mostly because it’s explained so briefly. I was like, that’s it? It has to be better than that!

I didn’t find the script all that smart. While I love the concept of this movie, it didn’t win me over completely, and a large part of its not winning me over was the script. The story isn’t as sharp or clear as it needs to be, and I thought the characters, the three astronauts, weren’t all that interesting.

Like you said, the acting was certainly good. That’s not a problem. I liked Warren Christie as Ben, and Lloyd Owen as Nate, and Ryan Robbins as the third astronaut, while he’s not in it as much as the other two, isn’t bad either.

In terms of generating scares and making you squirm, APOLLO 18 works, and by far, this is the best part of the movie. You really will feel uncomfortable, and I had fun with this. But like you said, when the story begins to provide answers, they’re not satisfactory, and the film falters here somewhat.

But early on it’s extremely creepy and satisfying. When they discover a rock sample on the floor of their ship, and they know it shouldn’t be there, it’s a really creepy moment because they know that if they didn’t put it there, there’s no one else around who could have done it.

I loved the scene inside the dark crater, although I did wonder why the astronaut couldn’t use a simple flashlight to light the darkness rather than the light he was using—something akin to a flash on a camera. Yeah, it made for a scary scene, but I’m not sure how much sense it makes.

I really liked the moon creatures in this one. They were unnerving and scary, especially if you don’t like bugs and other creepy crawly things, and the whole concept of what these creatures were, was clever and creative.

And while I liked the idea of the creatures getting inside the astronaut’s body, well, this is hardly original. ALIEN, anyone? Sure, it’s not the same exact concept, but it’s close enough.

LS: Yeah, something like ALIEN (1979) kind of makes APOLLO 18 look pretty crappy in comparison.

MA: I also thought the sense of isolation was present throughout this movie—especially when the two astronauts lose contact with NASA— and it really added to the frights.

LS: By the time the movie ended, I had really mixed feelings about it. There was a lot I really liked about APOLLO 18. But there were other things I hated. So over all, I give it two and a half knives. It would have rated higher if the “secret” didn’t annoy me so much. But there was some good suspense. Maybe wait for cable or Netflix on this one.

MA: I loved the concept of this movie, and it’s one of the reasons I also loved the trailer. It’s a great idea, finding long lost footage of a secret moon mission filled with mystery and strange creatures, but it’s a mystery that falls short and never becomes the compelling plot point it needs to be to lift this film to classic status.

It’s creepy, don’t get me wrong, and I had fun being on the edge of my seat, but the story and characters are just OK, and as a result, this film never does deliver a knockout punch. I’m giving it two and a half knives, too.

So, that wraps things up. We can go home now. What’s the matter? You don’t look so good.

LS (looking a little pale): I think I ate one too many moon snacks.

MA: Well, there’s a portable moon bathroom over there.

LS: I’m not going in there. You ever use one of those intergalactic public bathrooms?

MA: No, I can’t say that I have.

LS: PREDATORS may be superior hunters, but when it comes to aiming inside the bowl, they suck.

MA: That’s more information than I need to know, and on that note, let’s say so long and head back to Earth. Are you up for the trip?

LS: Hell, yeah. I’ll just take some medicine.

MA: Medicine? I’m glad you thought ahead. We’re pretty isolated up here.

LS (pops open a beer): For medicinal purposes, of course. Down one of these every four hours.

(LS pops open the glass of his helmet and sucks down the beer. Then he wipes his mouth with his sleeve, burps, and tosses the empty can in a crater)

LS: I feel better already!

MA: Okay folks, thanks for joining us. We’ll see you next week back on earth, with a review of another new movie.

—END—

© Copyright 2011 by Michael Arruda & L.L. Soares

Michael Arruda gives APOLLO 18 ~ two and a half knives!

LL Soares gives APOLLO 18 ~two and a half knives, too.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 89 other followers