THE EXPENDABLES
THE EXPENDABLES … It’s Action/Adventure Porn!
Review by John Harvey
If you’ve been reading any of the film reviews of Sylvester Stallone’s 1980s-style throwback to the golden era of cheeseball action/adventure films, THE EXPENDABLES, then you know that the reviews fall into one of two categories.
Either the reviewer loved the movie because it’s nothing but guns, explosions, bravado, explosions, one-liners, boobs, explosions, testosterone, fistfights and then some REALLY BIG EXPLOSIONS …
… or the reviewer hated the movie because it’s nothing but guns, explosions, bravado, explosions, one-liners, boobs, explosions, testosterone, fistfights, and then some REALLY BIG EXPLOSIONS.
So, it appears that we’re all agreement. THE EXPENDABLES is nothing but explosions, bravado, explosions, etc., etc., and so on. And really, what do you expect when you put Sylvester Stallone, Jason Statham, Jet Li, Dolph Lundgren, Terry Crews, Mickey Rourke, Randy Couture, Stone Cold Steve Austin, Bruce Willis and Arnold Schwarzenegger in the same movie? A sequel to THE REMAINS OF THE DAY (1993)?
This movie is what would happen if I was 10 years-old and my parents gave me a well-funded film studio for Christmas. It is an entirely juvenile romp through all the best (and lovably worst) action film tropes and gimmicks that were exemplified by the The Cannon Group films in the 1980s.
Here’s the gist of the plot. Stallone and his muscle-bound buddies make up a mercenary team hired to overthrow a South American dictator (David Zayas) and the American drug lord (Eric Roberts) who finances his operation. But really … who cares?
If you’re going to enjoy this movies, then you see it for the popcorn-chomping cheap thrills, nostalgia, chuckles and acts of violence and mayhem that zoom well past the borders of being ludicrous. That’s what I went for, and I came away entirely satisfied. All the actors play (and overact) their roles admirably and with many winks to the audience. While THE EXPENDABLES may not win any Oscars for acting, Stallone should get some sort of trophy for herding that many big egos into one film and churning out something fun to watch.
Is the movie without flaws? No. Remember that THE EXPENDABLES is built on a gimmick rather than an original concept, so certain scenes and sub-plots fall flat because there’s no framework to hold up anything resembling real storytelling. In addition, Stallone used a lot of quick cuts and other camera tricks to juice up the physically-demanding fight scenes and obscure the simple fact that many of the stars are … well … old.
Also, while there’s been tons of hoopla about the HUGE cast of action/adventure stars in this film, the bulk of THE EXPENDABLES’ screen time belongs to Stallone and Statham. After that, Dolph Lundgren, Jet Li, and Mickey Rourke fall in the “distant second” category. Most of the other featured names are window dressing, while Willis and Schwarzenegger share a one-scene cameo with Stallone.
I have to admit, I had a lot of fun watching Lundgren … err … act in this film. He’s a dreadful actor (though probably smarter than the rest of the cast combined … See Footnote 1), but you can tell that he knows it and doesn’t mind. This makes watching his performance oddly endearing. I also found it humorous and a little surreal to see Mickey Rourke taking up the Obi Wan Kenobi persona in THE EXPENDABLES.
Ultimately, THE EXPENDABLES was great fun and perfectly suited for viewing on the big screen (many awe-inspiring fireballs). It reminds us that low-concept films don’t have to default to being bad movies, as long as you can appreciate them solely at face value. Movies like this need to be taken in as a whole. Once you start nit-picking at the details (like, you know, logic and physics), then that’s the moment when you start missing the point.
For example, if pressed, what do I think would have made THE EXPENDABLES a much better movie? Honestly … more boobs.
Directed by: Sylvester Stallone
Written by: Dave Callaham and Sylvester Stallone
Starring: Sylvester Stallone, Jason Statham, Jet Li, Dolph Lundgren, Terry Crews, Mickey Rourke, Randy Couture, Eric Roberts, David Zayas, Stone Cold Steve Austin, Bruce Willis, and Arnold Schwarzenegger.
Rating: R
Run Time: 1hr 43min
***
Footnote 1: Not a lot of folks know this, but Dolph Lundgren has a huge brain. He holds a master’s degree in chemical engineering and was awarded a Fulbright Scholarship to the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. He speaks Swedish, English, German, French, Spanish, some Japanese, and some Italian.
– END -
© Copyright 2010 by John D. Harvey
August 17, 2010 at 3:47 am
LOL @ your MORE BOOBS comment.
August 17, 2010 at 10:12 am
Glad you liked the review, Nick.
August 17, 2010 at 11:06 am
John’s reviews always kick ass.
August 17, 2010 at 11:08 am
Hey – how come Steven Seigal and Van Damme weren’t in it?
August 17, 2010 at 9:40 pm
Actually, Jean-Claude Van Damme had been considered for the role played by Dolph Lundgren. It is thought that Stallone went with Lundgren eventually because they’ve worked together before (obviously). So, Lundgren was more of a known quantity.
As far as Steven Seagal is concerned, rumor has it that he’s accumulating rather a lot of … ummm … baggage: http://today.msnbc.msn.com/id/36446224 . Perhaps he would have attracted the wrong kind of media attention.
The actor who should have been in this film but wasn’t is Chuck Norris.
August 18, 2010 at 1:54 am
Why couldn’t they have Van Damme and Dolph? Oh well. I agree about Seigal. And I agree that Chuck Norris would have fit right in.
August 18, 2010 at 2:05 am
Though I enjoyed this movie, as it is it danced along the edge of having too many spices in a single dish. Adding one more guy might have tipped the scale. Who knows?
I suspect that there was also a matter of schedules and budgets. This entire film was shot over only three months, which is pretty impressive considering the number of moving parts in terms of actors’ schedules, sets, pyrotechnics, and stunt work.
Also, there are persistent rumors that THE EXPENDABLES is going to spawn a franchise of pseudo-sequels featuring the different actors in more prominent roles. So, you could get your wish and see an EXPENDABLES starring Van Damme.
August 18, 2010 at 2:59 am
If a sequel does get Van Damme, I hope they don’t do those terrible repeated shots they used to do every time he kicked someone. You’d see him throw the same kick over and over before the person went flying back, as though it added more OOMPF! to the blow. Nowadays, people might think their disc is skipping and return the movie, lol!
August 18, 2010 at 3:10 am
Actually, the gutsy (and potentially hilarious) move would be to loop that repeated-kick shot for 10 minutes straight.
August 18, 2010 at 11:14 am
I actually am not a fan of Van Damme’s, but I think he’s such an awful actor he’s funny. And an extended kick shot loop would be hilarious. Dolph is definitely better, though, so I’m glad they went with him.
John – you’re right about it being amazing how they got so many actors to get their schedules in sync. I bet a few of them were sitting on the couch waiting for someone to call them, though. LOL
August 18, 2010 at 2:52 pm
Honestly, I’ve been waiting years for all of these guys (or most of them) to somehow get into a movie together. it’s amazing it took this long. Lauran, your last point is well taken. Maybe it took time for egos (and schedules) to lighten up a bit first. I always enjoyed these guys – Chuck Norris would have been uber cool (yea, “uber cool” is my new catch phrase, and yea, it’s a sucky one but hey…). Cool review, and cool post-discussion.
August 18, 2010 at 3:13 pm
Maybe Steven Seagal was busy making MACHETE, since he’s in this upcoming Robert Rodriguez movie starring Danny Trejo.
I’d read that Stallone actually did approach Van Damme, but he wasn’t available.
While I enjoyed THE EXPENDABLES too, I thought Mickey Rourke should have been part of the team rather than sitting on the sidelines. The film also could have used a more formidable villain. I would have liked to have seen Bruce Willis as the main baddie.
Great review, John!